» Articles » PMID: 40060422

Parietal Cortex is Recruited by Frontal and Cingulate Areas to Support Action Monitoring and Updating During Stopping

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2025 Mar 10
PMID 40060422
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In Brief: Functional connectivity between the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and a set of frontal and cingulate regions indicates that IPS is recruited to aid inhibitory control. Control failures are associated with increased communication with posterior cingulate. IPS could be a novel and tractable neuromodulation target for control-related neuropsychiatric disorders.

Highlights: Parietal cortex displays performance-dependent activity in action stoppingFunctional connectivity between IPS and IFG underlies successful stoppingEarly communication from ACC and OFC to IPS is also specific to successful stoppingCommunication from PCC to IPS is higher during lapses in control.

References
1.
Rushworth M, Taylor P . TMS in the parietal cortex: updating representations for attention and action. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44(13):2700-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.12.007. View

2.
Morecraft R, Stilwell-Morecraft K, Cipolloni P, Ge J, McNeal D, Pandya D . Cytoarchitecture and cortical connections of the anterior cingulate and adjacent somatomotor fields in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res Bull. 2012; 87(4-5):457-97. PMC: 3295893. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.12.005. View

3.
Balasubramani P, Pesce M, Hayden B . Activity in orbitofrontal neuronal ensembles reflects inhibitory control. Eur J Neurosci. 2019; 51(10):2033-2051. PMC: 8214402. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14638. View

4.
Jana S, Hannah R, Muralidharan V, Aron A . Temporal cascade of frontal, motor and muscle processes underlying human action-stopping. Elife. 2020; 9. PMC: 7159878. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.50371. View

5.
Hannah R, Jana S . Disentangling the role of posterior parietal cortex in response inhibition. J Neurosci. 2019; 39(35):6814-6816. PMC: 6733565. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0785-19.2019. View