» Articles » PMID: 31012235

Physicochemical Characterization of Polymer-Stabilized Coacervate Protocells

Overview
Journal Chembiochem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2019 Apr 24
PMID 31012235
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The bottom-up construction of cell mimics has produced a range of membrane-bound protocells that have been endowed with functionality and biochemical processes reminiscent of living systems. The contents of these compartments, however, experience semidilute conditions, whereas macromolecules in the cytosol exist in protein-rich, crowded environments that affect their physicochemical properties, such as diffusion and catalytic activity. Recently, complex coacervates have emerged as attractive protocellular models because their condensed interiors would be expected to mimic this crowding better. Here we explore some relevant physicochemical properties of a recently developed polymer-stabilized coacervate system, such as the diffusion of macromolecules in the condensed coacervate phase, relative to in dilute solutions, the buffering capacity of the core, the molecular organization of the polymer membrane, the permeability characteristics of this membrane towards a wide range of compounds, and the behavior of a simple enzymatic reaction. In addition, either the coacervate charge or the cargo charge is engineered to allow the selective loading of protein cargo into the coacervate protocells. Our in-depth characterization has revealed that these polymer-stabilized coacervate protocells have many desirable properties, thus making them attractive candidates for the investigation of biochemical processes in stable, controlled, tunable, and increasingly cell-like environments.

Citing Articles

Supramolecular polymers form tactoids through liquid-liquid phase separation.

Fu H, Huang J, van der Tol J, Su L, Wang Y, Dey S Nature. 2024; 626(8001):1011-1018.

PMID: 38418913 PMC: 10901743. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07034-7.


Tuning of Cationic Polymer Functionality in Complex Coacervate Artificial Cells for Optimized Enzyme Activity.

Cook A, Delgado Gonzalez B, van Hest J Biomacromolecules. 2023; 25(1):425-435.

PMID: 38064593 PMC: 10777345. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c01063.


Membranized Coacervate Microdroplets: from Versatile Protocell Models to Cytomimetic Materials.

Gao N, Mann S Acc Chem Res. 2023; 56(3):297-307.

PMID: 36625520 PMC: 9910039. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00696.


DNA-Mediated Protein Shuttling between Coacervate-Based Artificial Cells.

Mashima T, van Stevendaal M, Cornelissens F, Mason A, Rosier B, Altenburg W Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2022; 61(17):e202115041.

PMID: 35133040 PMC: 9303767. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202115041.


Engineering transient dynamics of artificial cells by stochastic distribution of enzymes.

Song S, Mason A, Post R, De Corato M, Mestre R, Yewdall N Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):6897.

PMID: 34824231 PMC: 8617035. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27229-0.


References
1.
Brea R, Hardy M, Devaraj N . Towards self-assembled hybrid artificial cells: novel bottom-up approaches to functional synthetic membranes. Chemistry. 2015; 21(36):12564-70. PMC: 4617832. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201501229. View

2.
Buddingh B, van Hest J . Artificial Cells: Synthetic Compartments with Life-like Functionality and Adaptivity. Acc Chem Res. 2017; 50(4):769-777. PMC: 5397886. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00512. View

3.
Wilks J, Slonczewski J . pH of the cytoplasm and periplasm of Escherichia coli: rapid measurement by green fluorescent protein fluorimetry. J Bacteriol. 2007; 189(15):5601-7. PMC: 1951819. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00615-07. View

4.
Banani S, Lee H, Hyman A, Rosen M . Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017; 18(5):285-298. PMC: 7434221. DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2017.7. View

5.
Davis B, Aumiller Jr W, Hashemian N, An S, Armaou A, Keating C . Colocalization and Sequential Enzyme Activity in Aqueous Biphasic Systems: Experiments and Modeling. Biophys J. 2015; 109(10):2182-94. PMC: 4656855. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.09.020. View