Comprehensive Image Quality Evaluation and Motion Phantom Studies of an Ultra-Fast (6-Second) Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging System on a Ring Gantry Linear Accelerator

Overview

Journal Adv Radiat Oncol

Specialty Oncology

Date 2024 Dec 24

PMID 39717196

Authors

Hui Zhao

Geoff Nelson

Vikren Sarkar

Courtney Oare

Martin Szegedi

Sara St James

Jeremy Kunz

Ryan Price

Y Jessica Huang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the image quality of an ultrafast cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system-Varian HyperSight.

Methods And Materials: In this evaluation, 5 studies were performed to assess the image quality of HyperSight CBCT. First, a HyperSight CBCT image quality evaluation was performed and compared with Siemens simulation-CT and Varian TrueBeam CBCT. Second, a visual comparison of image quality among simulation-CTs, HyperSight CBCT, and TrueBeam CBCT was performed for a patient with head and neck cancer and patients with metal dental fillings and prostheses. Third, the Hounsfield unit (HU) versus electron density curve of HyperSight CBCT was compared with GE and Siemens simulation CTs. Fourth, Siemens simulation-CT and HyperSight CBCT scans were acquired on the Catphan set-up at different locations inside the bore (±10 cm in all 3 principal directions from the center), and the HU variations for different materials were evaluated. Fifth, a 4-dimensional lung tumor phantom study was performed to assess moving tumor alignment during image registration.

Results: Significant improvement of image contrast, HU constancy, and noise level on HyperSight CBCT was observed compared with TrueBeam CBCT. Significant image quality improvement was observed on HyperSight CBCT for patients with dental fillings and prostheses compared with simulation-CT without metal artifact reduction. The linear fit trendline of HU versus electron density curves for GE simulation-CT, Siemens simulation-CT, and HyperSight CBCT showed a 0.6% difference for HU values below 2000. The maximum HU difference for HyperSight CBCT when Catphan was positioned within ±10 cm in all 3 principal directions was ≤ 98 on bone 50%, ≤ 29 other than bone, and was ≤ 31 on bone 50%, and ≤ 17 other than bone for Siemens simulation-CT. Both tumor shape and tumor alignment discrepancies on CBCT scans were observed in a 4-dimensional phantom study.

Conclusions: This evaluation shows significant image improvement of HyperSight CBCT over conventional CBCT on image contrast, HU constancy, and noise level with scatter correction and metal artifact reduction reconstruction methods. HyperSight CBCT has similar image quality to simulation-CTs and shows the potential application for treatment planning. The rapid acquisition of HyperSight CBCT showed both tumor shape and tumor alignment discrepancies of moving targets. Careful considerations of patient respiratory motion monitoring and target matching are highly recommended.

References

Henke L, Fischer-Valuck B, Rudra S, Wan L, Samson P, Srivastava A . Prospective imaging comparison of anatomic delineation with rapid kV cone beam CT on a novel ring gantry radiotherapy device. Radiother Oncol. 2022; 178:109428. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.017. View

Deng L, Zhang M, Wang J, Huang S, Yang X . Improving cone-beam CT quality using a cycle-residual connection with a dilated convolution-consistent generative adversarial network. Phys Med Biol. 2022; 67(14). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac7b0a. View

Lens E, van der Horst A, Kroon P, van Hooft J, Davila Fajardo R, Fockens P . Differences in respiratory-induced pancreatic tumor motion between 4D treatment planning CT and daily cone beam CT, measured using intratumoral fiducials. Acta Oncol. 2014; 53(9):1257-64. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.905699. View

Wang Z, Wu Q, Marks L, Larrier N, Yin F . Cone-beam CT localization of internal target volumes for stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung lesions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 69(5):1618-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.030. View

Manger R, Pawlicki T, Hoisak J, Kim G . Technical Note: Assessing the performance of monthly CBCT image quality QA. Med Phys. 2019; 46(6):2575-2579. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13535. View

Park J, Park S, Kim J, Yoon S, Song S, Liu Z . Liver motion during cone beam computed tomography guided stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2012; 39(10):6431-42. DOI: 10.1118/1.4754658. View

Vergalasova I, Maurer J, Yin F . Potential underestimation of the internal target volume (ITV) from free-breathing CBCT. Med Phys. 2011; 38(8):4689-99. PMC: 3161505. DOI: 10.1118/1.3613153. View

Siva S, Chesson B, Aarons Y, Clements N, Kron T, MacManus M . Implementation of a lung radiosurgery program: technical considerations and quality assurance in an Australian institution. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012; 56(3):354-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02367.x. View

Jin J, Ren L, Liu Q, Kim J, Wen N, Guan H . Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Phys. 2010; 37(11):5634-44. DOI: 10.1118/1.3497272. View

10.

Wang H, Liu X, Kong L, Huang Y, Chen H, Ma X . Improving CBCT image quality to the CT level using RegGAN in esophageal cancer adaptive radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol. 2023; 199(5):485-497. PMC: 10133081. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02039-5. View

11.

Kamomae T, Monzen H, Nakayama S, Mizote R, Oonishi Y, Kaneshige S . Accuracy of image guidance using free-breathing cone-beam computed tomography for stereotactic lung radiotherapy. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0126152. PMC: 4425686. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126152. View

12.

Yeung A, Li J, Shi W, Newlin H, Chvetsov A, Liu C . Tumor localization using cone-beam CT reduces setup margins in conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74(4):1100-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.048. View

13.

Trapp P, Maier J, Susenburger M, Sawall S, Kachelriess M . Empirical scatter correction: CBCT scatter artifact reduction without prior information. Med Phys. 2022; 49(7):4566-4584. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15656. View

14.

Blake S, Dillon O, Byrne H, OBrien R . Thoracic motion-compensated cone-beam computed tomography in under 20 seconds on a fast-rotating linac: A simulation study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(3):e13909. PMC: 10018653. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13909. View

15.

Zhang Y, Zhang L, Zhu X, Lee A, Chambers M, Dong L . Reducing metal artifacts in cone-beam CT images by preprocessing projection data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 67(3):924-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.045. View

16.

Padmanaban S, Boopathy R, Kunjithapatham B, Sukumar P, Nagarajan V . The effects of target motion in kV-CBCT imaging. Pol J Radiol. 2012; 75(1):61-6. PMC: 3389851. View

17.

Davis A, Palmer A, Nisbet A . Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review. Br J Radiol. 2017; 90(1076):20160406. PMC: 5603945. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160406. View

18.

Song J, Nam T, Ahn S, Chung W, Yoon M, Nah B . Respiratory motional effect on cone-beam CT in lung radiation surgery. Med Dosim. 2009; 34(2):117-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2008.07.004. View

19.

Lim R, Penoncello G, Hobbis D, Harrington D, Rong Y . Technical note: Characterization of novel iterative reconstructed cone beam CT images for dose tracking and adaptive radiotherapy on L-shape linacs. Med Phys. 2022; 49(12):7715-7732. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15943. View

20.

Goodenough D, Weaver K . Factors related to low contrast resolution in CT scanners. Comput Radiol. 1984; 8(5):297-308. DOI: 10.1016/0730-4862(84)90042-8. View