» Articles » PMID: 31001805

High-resolution Genomic Alterations in Barrett's Metaplasia of Patients Who Progress to Esophageal Dysplasia and Adenocarcinoma

Abstract

The main risk factor for esophageal dysplasia and adenocarcinoma (DAC) is Barrett's esophagus (BE), characterized by intestinal metaplasia. The critical genomic mechanisms that lead to progression of nondysplastic BE to DAC remain poorly understood and require analyses of longitudinal patient cohorts and high-resolution assays. We tested BE tissues from 74 patients, including 42 nonprogressors from two separate groups of 21 patients each and 32 progressors (16 in a longitudinal cohort before DAC/preprogression-BE and 16 with temporally concurrent but spatially separate DAC/concurrent-BE). We interrogated genome-wide somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) at the exon level with high-resolution SNP arrays in DNA from formalin-fixed samples histologically confirmed as nondysplastic BE. The most frequent abnormalities were SCNAs involving FHIT exon 5, CDKN2A/B or both in 88% longitudinal BE progressors to DAC vs. 24% in both nonprogressor groups (p = 0.0004). Deletions in other genomic regions were found in 56% of preprogression-BE but only in one nonprogressor-BE (p = 0.0004). SCNAs involving FHIT exon 5 and CDKN2A/B were also frequently detected in BE temporally concurrent with DAC. TP53 losses were detected in concurrent-BE but not earlier in preprogression-BE tissues of patients who developed DAC. CDKN2A/p16 immunohistochemistry showed significant loss of expression in BE of progressors vs. nonprogressors, supporting the genomic data. Our data suggest a role for CDKN2A/B and FHIT in early progression of BE to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma that warrants future mechanistic research. Alterations in CDKN2A/B and FHIT by high-resolution assays may serve as biomarkers of increased risk of progression to DAC when detected in BE tissues.

Citing Articles

Context-dependent effects of CDKN2A and other 9p21 gene losses during the evolution of esophageal cancer.

Ganguli P, Basanta C, Acha-Sagredo A, Misetic H, Armero M, Mendez A Nat Cancer. 2025; 6(1):158-174.

PMID: 39753721 PMC: 11779637. DOI: 10.1038/s43018-024-00876-0.


P53 Deficiency Accelerate Esophageal Epithelium Intestinal Metaplasia Malignancy.

Qiu Q, Guo G, Guo X, Hu X, Yu T, Liu G Biomedicines. 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36979860 PMC: 10046085. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11030882.


Potential Role of the Fragile Histidine Triad in Cancer Evo-Dev.

Niu Z, Jiang D, Shen J, Liu W, Tan X, Cao G Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 36831487 PMC: 9954361. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041144.


Abnormal TP53 Predicts Risk of Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus Regardless of a Diagnosis of Dysplasia.

Redston M, Noffsinger A, Kim A, Akarca F, Rara M, Stapleton D Gastroenterology. 2021; 162(2):468-481.

PMID: 34757142 PMC: 9341495. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.038.


Drivers of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Opportunities for Cancer Interception.

Garman K Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 12(2):787-788.

PMID: 34029533 PMC: 8348867. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.04.018.


References
1.
Desai T, Krishnan K, Samala N, Singh J, Cluley J, Perla S . The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2011; 61(7):970-6. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300730. View

2.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(1):7-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21442. View

3.
Klump B, Hsieh C, Holzmann K, Gregor M, Porschen R . Hypermethylation of the CDKN2/p16 promoter during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1998; 115(6):1381-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70016-2. View

4.
Michael D, Beer D, Wilke C, Miller D, Glover T . Frequent deletions of FHIT and FRA3B in Barrett's metaplasia and esophageal adenocarcinomas. Oncogene. 1998; 15(14):1653-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201330. View

5.
Wani S, Puli S, Shaheen N, Westhoff B, Slehria S, Bansal A . Esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus after endoscopic ablative therapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104(2):502-13. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.31. View