» Articles » PMID: 30993926

Effect of a Deep Learning Framework-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis System on the Diagnostic Performance of Radiologists in Differentiating Between Malignant and Benign Masses on Breast Ultrasonography

Overview
Journal Korean J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Apr 18
PMID 30993926
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system based on a deep learning framework (deep learning-based CAD) improves the diagnostic performance of radiologists in differentiating between malignant and benign masses on breast ultrasound (US).

Materials And Methods: B-mode US images were prospectively obtained for 253 breast masses (173 benign, 80 malignant) in 226 consecutive patients. Breast mass US findings were retrospectively analyzed by deep learning-based CAD and four radiologists. In predicting malignancy, the CAD results were dichotomized (possibly benign vs. possibly malignant). The radiologists independently assessed Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System final assessments for two datasets (US images alone or with CAD). For each dataset, the radiologists' final assessments were classified as positive (category 4a or higher) and negative (category 3 or lower). The diagnostic performances of the radiologists for the two datasets (US alone vs. US with CAD) were compared.

Results: When the CAD results were added to the US images, the radiologists showed significant improvement in specificity (range of all radiologists for US alone vs. US with CAD: 72.8-92.5% vs. 82.1-93.1%; < 0.001), accuracy (77.9-88.9% vs. 86.2-90.9%; = 0.038), and positive predictive value (PPV) (60.2-83.3% vs. 70.4-85.2%; = 0.001). However, there were no significant changes in sensitivity (81.3-88.8% vs. 86.3-95.0%; = 0.120) and negative predictive value (91.4-93.5% vs. 92.9-97.3%; = 0.259).

Conclusion: Deep learning-based CAD could improve radiologists' diagnostic performance by increasing their specificity, accuracy, and PPV in differentiating between malignant and benign masses on breast US.

Citing Articles

Comparative Study of AI Modes in Ultrasound Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.

Hong Y, Yu Z, Chou C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075807 PMC: 11898511. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050560.


Application of an artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system for breast ultrasound: a prospective study.

Jin Z, Li J, Niu R, Fu N, Jiang Y, Li S Gland Surg. 2025; 13(12):2221-2231.

PMID: 39822361 PMC: 11733640. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-213.


The top 100 most-cited articles on artificial intelligence in breast radiology: a bibliometric analysis.

Singh S, Healy N Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):297.

PMID: 39666106 PMC: 11638451. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01869-4.


Attention pyramid pooling network for artificial diagnosis on pulmonary nodules.

Wang H, Zhu H, Ding L, Yang K PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302641.

PMID: 38753596 PMC: 11098435. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302641.


Use of artificial intelligence in breast surgery: a narrative review.

Seth I, Lim B, Joseph K, Gracias D, Xie Y, Ross R Gland Surg. 2024; 13(3):395-411.

PMID: 38601286 PMC: 11002485. DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-414.


References
1.
Doi K . Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007; 31(4-5):198-211. PMC: 1955762. DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.002. View

2.
Suk H, Lee S, Shen D . Hierarchical feature representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for AD/MCI diagnosis. Neuroimage. 2014; 101:569-82. PMC: 4165842. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.077. View

3.
Lakhani P, Sundaram B . Deep Learning at Chest Radiography: Automated Classification of Pulmonary Tuberculosis by Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Radiology. 2017; 284(2):574-582. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162326. View

4.
Han S, Kang H, Jeong J, Park M, Kim W, Bang W . A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images. Phys Med Biol. 2017; 62(19):7714-7728. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa82ec. View

5.
Barlow W, Chi C, Carney P, Taplin S, DOrsi C, Cutter G . Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96(24):1840-50. PMC: 3143032. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh333. View