» Articles » PMID: 36698865

Improving Breast Cancer Diagnosis by Incorporating Raw Ultrasound Parameters into Machine Learning

Overview
Date 2023 Jan 26
PMID 36698865
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The improved diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound breast examinations remains an important goal. In this study, we propose a biophysical feature-based machine learning method for breast cancer detection to improve the performance beyond a benchmark deep learning algorithm and to furthermore provide a color overlay visual map of the probability of malignancy within a lesion. This overall framework is termed disease-specific imaging. Previously, 150 breast lesions were segmented and classified utilizing a modified fully convolutional network and a modified GoogLeNet, respectively. In this study multiparametric analysis was performed within the contoured lesions. Features were extracted from ultrasound radiofrequency, envelope, and log-compressed data based on biophysical and morphological models. The support vector machine with a Gaussian kernel constructed a nonlinear hyperplane, and we calculated the distance between the hyperplane and each feature's data point in multiparametric space. The distance can quantitatively assess a lesion and suggest the probability of malignancy that is color-coded and overlaid onto B-mode images. Training and evaluation were performed on patient data. The overall accuracy for the most common types and sizes of breast lesions in our study exceeded 98.0% for classification and 0.98 for an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which is more precise than the performance of radiologists and a deep learning system. Further, the correlation between the probability and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System enables a quantitative guideline to predict breast cancer. Therefore, we anticipate that the proposed framework can help radiologists achieve more accurate and convenient breast cancer classification and detection.

Citing Articles

BUSClean: Open-source software for breast ultrasound image pre-processing and knowledge extraction for medical AI.

Bunnell A, Hung K, Shepherd J, Sadowski P PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315434.

PMID: 39661621 PMC: 11633980. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315434.


Using the GoogLeNet deep-learning model to distinguish between benign and malignant breast masses based on conventional ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang J, Tong J, Li J, Cao C, Wang S, Bi T Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(10):7111-7127.

PMID: 39429606 PMC: 11485374. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-679.


Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.

Guo Y, Zhang H, Yuan L, Chen W, Zhao H, Yu Q J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(4):3000605241237867.

PMID: 38663911 PMC: 11047257. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241237867.


H-Scan Discrimination for Tumor Microenvironmental Heterogeneity in Melanoma.

Baek J, Qin S, Prieto P, Parker K Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023; 50(2):268-276.

PMID: 37993356 PMC: 10794040. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.10.012.

References
1.
Gare G, Li J, Joshi R, Magar R, Vaze M, Yousefpour M . W-Net: Dense and diagnostic semantic segmentation of subcutaneous and breast tissue in ultrasound images by incorporating ultrasound RF waveform data. Med Image Anal. 2021; 76:102326. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102326. View

2.
Barr R . Future of breast elastography. Ultrasonography. 2019; 38(2):93-105. PMC: 6443587. DOI: 10.14366/usg.18053. View

3.
Wang Y, Choi E, Choi Y, Zhang H, Jin G, Ko S . Breast Cancer Classification in Automated Breast Ultrasound Using Multiview Convolutional Neural Network with Transfer Learning. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020; 46(5):1119-1132. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.01.001. View

4.
Parker K, Poul S . Burr, Lomax, Pareto, and Logistic Distributions from Ultrasound Speckle. Ultrason Imaging. 2020; 42(4-5):203-212. PMC: 7818386. DOI: 10.1177/0161734620930621. View

5.
Chang R, Wu W, Moon W, Chen D . Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005; 89(2):179-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-004-2043-z. View