» Articles » PMID: 30984914

Preventing Egregious Ethical Violations in Medical Practice: Evidence-Informed Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Working Group

Abstract

This article reports the consensus recommendations of a working group that was convened at the end of a 4-year research project funded by the National Institutes of Health that examined 280 cases of egregious ethical violations in medical practice. The group reviewed data from the parent project, as well as other research on sexual abuse of patients, criminal prescribing of controlled substances, and unnecessary invasive procedures that were prosecuted as fraud. The working group embraced the goals of making such violations significantly less frequent and, when they do occur, identifying them sooner and taking necessary steps to ensure they are not repeated. Following review of data and previously published recommendations, the working group developed 10 recommendations that provide a starting point to meet these goals. Recommendations address leadership, oversight, tracking, disciplinary actions, education of patients, partnerships with law enforcement, further research and related matters. The working group recognized the need for further refinement of the recommendations to ensure feasibility and appropriate balance between protection of patients and fairness to physicians. While full implementation of appropriate measures will require time and study, we believe it is urgent to take visible actions to acknowledge and address the problem at hand.

Citing Articles

A global scoping review on the patterns of medical fraud and abuse: integrating data-driven detection, prevention, and legal responses.

Najar A, Alizamani L, Zarqi M, Hooshmand E Arch Public Health. 2025; 83(1):43.

PMID: 39962606 PMC: 11831774. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-025-01512-8.


The impact of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic on the professional identity formation of medical students: A systematic scoping review.

Liang J, Ng D, Raveendran V, Teo M, Quah E, Chua K PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0296367.

PMID: 38181035 PMC: 10769105. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296367.


Responding to Sexual Abuse in Health Care: Development of a Guide for Patients.

McIntosh T, Walsh H, Parsons M, Solomon E, Mozersky J, DuBois J J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022; 9(2):117-121.

PMID: 35600235 PMC: 9022717. DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1881.


Development of a Resource Guide to Help Patients Receive Appropriate Care.

Solomon E, Walsh H, Parsons M, McIntosh T, Mozersky J, DuBois J J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021; 32(4):2249-2257.

PMID: 34803074 PMC: 8845081. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0197.


The opioid-impaired provider: A call for national guidance to maximize rehabilitation while protecting patient safety.

Watson G, Selfridge N, Wright B Health Sci Rep. 2020; 3(4):e193.

PMID: 33043151 PMC: 7537421. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.193.

References
1.
Pellegrino E . Toward a virtue-based normative ethics for the health professions. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995; 5(3):253-77. DOI: 10.1353/ken.0.0044. View

2.
. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136(3):243-6. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-00012. View

3.
Carr G . Professional sexual misconduct--an overview. J Miss State Med Assoc. 2003; 44(9):283-300. View

4.
Kohatsu N, Gould D, Ross L, Fox P . Characteristics associated with physician discipline: a case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164(6):653-8. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.6.653. View

5.
Khaliq A, Dimassi H, Huang C, Narine L, Smego Jr R . Disciplinary action against physicians: who is likely to get disciplined?. Am J Med. 2005; 118(7):773-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.051. View