» Articles » PMID: 15037494

Characteristics Associated with Physician Discipline: a Case-control Study

Overview
Journal Arch Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2004 Mar 24
PMID 15037494
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There has been increasing attention devoted to patient safety. However, the focus has been on system improvements rather than individual physician performance issues. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an association between certain physician characteristics and the likelihood of medical board-imposed discipline.

Methods: Unmatched, case-control study of 890 physicians disciplined by the Medical Board of California between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 2001, compared with 2981 randomly selected, nondisciplined controls. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for physician discipline with respect to age, sex, board certification, international medical school education, and specialty.

Results: Male sex (OR, 2.76; P<.001), lack of board certification (OR, 2.22; P<.001), increasing age (OR, 1.64; P<.001), and international medical school education (OR, 1.36; P<.001) were associated with an elevated risk for disciplinary action that included license revocation, practice suspension, probation, and public reprimand. The following specialties had an increased risk for discipline compared with internal medicine: family practice (OR, 1.68; P =.002); general practice (OR, 1.97, P =.001); obstetrics and gynecology (OR, 2.25; P<.001); and psychiatry (OR, 1.87; P<.001). Physicians in pediatrics (OR, 0.62; P =.001) and radiology (OR, 0.36; P<.001) were less likely to receive discipline compared with those in internal medicine.

Conclusion: Certain physician characteristics and medical specialties are associated with an increased likelihood of discipline.

Citing Articles

Survey of Physicians on the Need for Female Chaperones Based on the Body Areas Examined in Female Patients by Male Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

Yokokawa D, Uehara T, Sato R, Ishizuka K, Li Y, Shikino K Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77208.

PMID: 39925509 PMC: 11807408. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77208.


Risk identification and prediction of complaints and misconduct against health practitioners: a scoping review.

Wang Y, Ram S, Scahill S Int J Qual Health Care. 2023; 36(1).

PMID: 38155372 PMC: 10791111. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad114.


Professionalism in Physician Assistant Education as a Predictor of Future Licensing Board Disciplinary Actions.

Barry C, Coombs J, Buchs S, Kim S, Grant T, Henry T J Physician Assist Educ. 2023; 34(4):278-282.

PMID: 37467183 PMC: 10653293. DOI: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000515.


The Presence of Ghost Publications Among Canadian Plastic Surgery Residency Applicants: How Honest Are Canadians?.

ElHawary H, Bucevska M, Pawliuk C, Wang A, Seal A, Gilardino M Plast Surg (Oakv). 2022; 30(2):159-163.

PMID: 35572077 PMC: 9096861. DOI: 10.1177/22925503211003843.


Association Between Web-Based Physician Ratings and Physician Disciplinary Convictions: Retrospective Observational Study.

Liu J, Goldberg H, Lentz E, Matelski J, Alam A, Bell C J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(5):e16708.

PMID: 32406851 PMC: 7256745. DOI: 10.2196/16708.