» Articles » PMID: 30981752

Fat Preference and Fat Intake in Individuals with and Without Anorexia Nervosa

Overview
Journal Appetite
Date 2019 Apr 15
PMID 30981752
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fat restriction is a characteristic eating behavior among individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN), and laboratory meal studies demonstrate restricted fat intake among low-weight patients. The Geiselman Food Preference Questionnaire-I (FPQ) is a validated self-report measure that yields a fat preference score (FPS). Prior research reported that patients with AN had a significantly lower FPS than did healthy control (HC) participants. The goal of the current study was to compare self-reported fat preference (FPS) to fat intake (multi-item meal (MIM) study) in low-weight ANs and HCs. Specific aims were 1) to determine if the FPS differed between ANs and HCs; 2) to determine if fat and energy intakes differed between ANs and HCs; and 3) to determine if the FPS was associated with fat and energy intakes in ANs and HCs. Forty-four female AN inpatients and 48 female HCs completed the FPQ and participated in a MIM study. Compared to HCs, ANs consumed less energy (469.1 ± 397.7 vs. 856.4 ± 346.8 kcal, p < 0.001), less fat (16.4 ± 20.4 vs. 36.7 ± 18.9 g, p < 0.001), and a smaller percentage of calories from fat (22.9 ± 13.8 vs. 36.6 ± 8.0%, p < 0.001) at the MIM. Compared to HCs, ANs also had a lower FPS (79.7 ± 27.4 vs. 102.3 ± 18.9, p < 0.001). The FPS was significantly and positively correlated with caloric intake (r = 0.481, p < 0.01), total fat (r = 0.453, p < 0.01), and the percentage of calories from fat (r = 0.37, p < 0.05) in ANs as well as in HCs (kcal: r = 0.583, p < 0.001; fat: r = 0.621, p < 0.001; % fat kcal: r = 0.601, p < 0.001). The FPS is related to objective measures of energy and fat intake in patients with AN as well as in healthy individuals.

Citing Articles

Harnessing precision nutrition to individualize weight restoration in anorexia nervosa.

Rodriguez I, Huckins L, Bulik C, Xu J, Igudesman D J Eat Disord. 2025; 13(1):29.

PMID: 39962541 PMC: 11834214. DOI: 10.1186/s40337-025-01209-x.


Association between ultraprocessed foods consumption, eating disorders, food addiction and body image: a systematic review.

Pereira T, Mocellin M, Curioni C BMJ Open. 2025; 14(12):e091223.

PMID: 39806616 PMC: 11664383. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091223.


The buffet challenge: a behavioral assessment of eating behavior in adolescents with an eating disorder.

Cooper M, Mears C, Heckert K, Orloff N, Peebles R, Timko C J Eat Disord. 2024; 12(1):8.

PMID: 38238787 PMC: 10797715. DOI: 10.1186/s40337-024-00968-3.


Triangulating brain alterations in anorexia nervosa: a multimodal investigation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, morphometry and blood-based biomarkers.

Doose A, Tam F, Hellerhoff I, King J, Boehm I, Gottloeber K Transl Psychiatry. 2023; 13(1):277.

PMID: 37573444 PMC: 10423271. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-023-02580-6.


Food avoidance in anorexia nervosa: associated and predicting factors.

Di Lodovico L, Vansteene C, Poupon D, Gorwood P, Duriez P Eat Weight Disord. 2023; 28(1):24.

PMID: 36821001 PMC: 9950187. DOI: 10.1007/s40519-023-01545-4.


References
1.
McVay M, Voils C, Coffman C, Geiselman P, Kolotkin R, Mayer S . Factors associated with choice of a low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet during a behavioral weight loss intervention. Appetite. 2014; 83:117-124. PMC: 4861996. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.023. View

2.
Schebendach J, Mayer L, Devlin M, Attia E, Contento I, Wolf R . Food choice and diet variety in weight-restored patients with anorexia nervosa. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111(5):732-6. PMC: 3083637. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.02.002. View

3.
McCrory M, Burke A, Roberts S . Dietary (sensory) variety and energy balance. Physiol Behav. 2012; 107(4):576-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.06.012. View

4.
Mond J, Hay P, Rodgers B, Owen C . Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q): norms for young adult women. Behav Res Ther. 2005; 44(1):53-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.12.003. View

5.
Sysko R, Steinglass J, Schebendach J, Mayer L, Walsh B . Rigor and reproducibility via laboratory studies of eating behavior: A focused update and conceptual review. Int J Eat Disord. 2018; 51(7):608-616. DOI: 10.1002/eat.22900. View