» Articles » PMID: 30981280

Encrustations on Ureteral Stents from Patients Without Urinary Tract Infection Reveal Distinct Urotypes and a Low Bacterial Load

Overview
Journal Microbiome
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Genetics
Microbiology
Date 2019 Apr 15
PMID 30981280
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current knowledge of the urinary tract microbiome is limited to urine analysis and analysis of biofilms formed on Foley catheters. Bacterial biofilms on ureteral stents have rarely been investigated, and no cultivation-independent data are available on the microbiome of the encrustations on the stents.

Results: The typical encrustations of organic and inorganic urine-derived material, including microbial biofilms formed during 3-6 weeks on ureteral stents in patients treated for kidney and ureteral stones, and without reported urinary tract infection at the time of stent insertion, were analysed. Next-generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 region revealed presence of different urotypes, distinct bacterial communities. Analysis of bacterial load was performed by combining quantification of 16S rRNA gene copy numbers by qPCR with microscopy and cultivation-dependent analysis methods, which revealed that ureteral stent biofilms mostly contain low numbers of bacteria. Fluorescence microscopy indicates the presence of extracellular DNA. Bacteria identified in biofilms by microscopy had mostly morphogenic similarities to gram-positive bacteria, in few cases to Lactobacillus and Corynebacterium, while sequencing showed many additional bacterial genera. Weddellite crystals were absent in biofilms of patients with Enterobacterales and Corynebacterium-dominated microbiomes.

Conclusions: This study provides novel insights into the bacterial burden in ureteral stent encrustations and the urinary tract microbiome. Short-term (3-6 weeks) ureteral stenting is associated with a low load of viable and visible bacteria in ureteral stent encrustations, which may be different from long-term stenting. Patients could be classified according to different urotypes, some of which were dominated by potentially pathogenic species. Facultative pathogens however appear to be a common feature in patients without clinically manifested urinary tract infection.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02845726 . Registered on 30 June 2016-retrospectively registered.

Citing Articles

Unraveling the impact of host genetics and factors on the urinary microbiome in a young population.

Zou L, Zhang Z, Chen J, Guo R, Tong X, Ju Y mBio. 2024; 15(12):e0277324.

PMID: 39513726 PMC: 11633168. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02773-24.


Identifying ureteral stent encrustation using machine learning based on CT radiomics features: a bicentric study.

Qiu J, Yan M, Wang H, Liu Z, Wang G, Wu X Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1202486.

PMID: 37601775 PMC: 10433756. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1202486.


The Microbiome's Influence on Head and Neck Cancers.

Dorobisz K, Dorobisz T, Zatonski T Curr Oncol Rep. 2023; 25(3):163-171.

PMID: 36696075 PMC: 9947050. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01352-7.


study on heparin/poly-l-lysine-copper coating for surface functionalization of ureteral stent.

Awonusi B, Li J, Li H, Wang Z, Hu J, Yang K Regen Biomater. 2022; 9:rbac083.

PMID: 36338173 PMC: 9629973. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbac083.


Interactive Effects of Copper-Doped Urological Implants with Tissue in the Urinary Tract for the Inhibition of Cell Adhesion and Encrustation in the Animal Model Rat.

Kram W, Rebl H, de la Cruz J, Haag A, Renner J, Epting T Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(16).

PMID: 36015581 PMC: 9412396. DOI: 10.3390/polym14163324.


References
1.
Roupret M, Daudon M, Hupertan V, Gattegno B, Thibault P, Traxer O . Can ureteral stent encrustation analysis predict urinary stone composition?. Urology. 2005; 66(2):246-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.054. View

2.
Buhmann M, Abt D, Altenried S, Rupper P, Betschart P, Zumstein V . Extraction of Biofilms From Ureteral Stents for Quantification and Cultivation-Dependent and -Independent Analyses. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:1470. PMC: 6052902. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01470. View

3.
van Houdt R, Ma B, Bruisten S, Speksnijder A, Ravel J, de Vries H . -dominated vaginal microbiota is associated with increased susceptibility to infection in Dutch women: a case-control study. Sex Transm Infect. 2017; 94(2):117-123. PMC: 6083440. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053133. View

4.
Wolfe A, Brubaker L . "Sterile Urine" and the Presence of Bacteria. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(2):173-4. PMC: 4659483. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.041. View

5.
Botezatu I, Serdyuk O, Potapova G, Shelepov V, Alechina R, Molyaka Y . Genetic analysis of DNA excreted in urine: a new approach for detecting specific genomic DNA sequences from cells dying in an organism. Clin Chem. 2000; 46(8 Pt 1):1078-84. View