» Articles » PMID: 30974181

Assessment of the Influence of Food Attributes on Meal Choice Selection by Socioeconomic Status and Race/ethnicity Among Women Living in Chicago, USA: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Overview
Journal Appetite
Date 2019 Apr 12
PMID 30974181
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Large and persistent obesity disparities exist in the US by socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity, and weight loss interventions have traditionally been less effective in these populations. Thus, a better understanding is needed of the behavioral, economic, and geographic factors that influence obesity risk factors such as eating behaviors. We used a discrete choice experiment to evaluate the impact of different meal attributes on meal choice and to test whether the relative importance of these attributes varied by SES and race/ethnicity. Study participants (n = 228) were given a series of 10 choice tasks and asked to choose among 4 meals, each rated based on the following attributes: taste; healthfulness; preparation time; travel time to food outlet for meal/ingredients; and price. SES was measured using education and self-reported difficulty paying for basics. Race/ethnicity was categorized as Hispanic/Latina, non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, and non-Hispanic other. Data were analyzed using mixed logit regression models with interaction terms to determine whether meal attributes influenced meal choices differentially by SES and race/ethnicity. Healthfulness and taste were the most important attributes for all participants. Price was a more important attribute among those in the lowest SES group compared with those in the higher SES groups. Travel was the least important attribute for low SES participants, and it was not significantly related to meal choice in these groups. Discrete choice experiments as illustrated here may help pinpoint the most salient targets for interventions to improve eating behaviors and reduce obesity disparities. Specifically, our findings suggest interventions should incorporate strategies to target the pricing of healthy and unhealthy food options.

Citing Articles

Who chooses "healthy" meals? An analysis of lunchtime meal quality in a workplace cafeteria.

Bullock S, Winthrop H, Hales D, Lin F, Yang Y, Ammerman A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):921.

PMID: 38553694 PMC: 10979548. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18284-5.


The politics of agricultural policy and nutrition: A case study of Malawi's Farm Input Subsidy Programme (FISP).

Walls H, Johnston D, Matita M, Kamwanja T, Smith R, Nanama S PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(10):e0002410.

PMID: 37819904 PMC: 10566744. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002410.


Influencing Factors and Group Differences of Urban Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Agricultural Products in China.

Geng N, Liu Z, Han X, Zhang X Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(1).

PMID: 36612679 PMC: 9819801. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010358.


Factors Affecting Food Consumers' Behavior during COVID-19 in Romania.

Muresan I, Harun R, Brata A, Brata V, Chiciudean D, Tirpe O Foods. 2022; 11(15).

PMID: 35954042 PMC: 9367920. DOI: 10.3390/foods11152275.


Affordability influences nutritional quality of seafood consumption among income and race/ethnicity groups in the United States.

Love D, Thorne-Lyman A, Conrad Z, Gephart J, Asche F, Godo-Solo D Am J Clin Nutr. 2022; 116(2):415-425.

PMID: 35691612 PMC: 9348982. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac099.


References
1.
Hauber A, Gonzalez J, Groothuis-Oudshoorn C, Prior T, Marshall D, Cunningham C . Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016; 19(4):300-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. View

2.
Glanz K, Basil M, MAIBACH E, Goldberg J, Snyder D . Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998; 98(10):1118-26. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00260-0. View

3.
de Bekker-Grob E, Ryan M, Gerard K . Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012; 21(2):145-72. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1697. View

4.
Mayne S, Auchincloss A, Michael Y . Impact of policy and built environment changes on obesity-related outcomes: a systematic review of naturally occurring experiments. Obes Rev. 2015; 16(5):362-75. PMC: 4789114. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12269. View

5.
Rogus S, Athens J, Cantor J, Elbel B . Measuring Micro-Level Effects of a New Supermarket: Do Residents Within 0.5 Mile Have Improved Dietary Behaviors?. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017; 118(6):1037-1046. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.360. View