» Articles » PMID: 30960888

Insights into Bacterial Cellulose Biosynthesis from Different Carbon Sources and the Associated Biochemical Transformation Pathways in Sp. W1

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Apr 10
PMID 30960888
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cellulose is the most abundant and widely used biopolymer on earth and can be produced by both plants and micro-organisms. Among bacterial cellulose (BC)-producing bacteria, the strains in genus have attracted wide attention due to their particular ability in furthering BC production. Our previous study reported a new strain of genus from a vinegar factory. To evaluate its capacity for BC production from different carbon sources, the present study subjected the strain to media spiked with 2% acetate, ethanol, fructose, glucose, lactose, mannitol or sucrose. Then the BC productivity, BC characteristics and biochemical transformation pathways of various carbon sources were fully investigated. After 14 days of incubation, strain W1 produced 0.040⁻1.529 g L BC, the highest yield being observed in fructose. Unlike BC yields, the morphology and microfibrils of BCs from different carbon sources were similar, with an average diameter of 35⁻50 nm. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that all membranes produced from various carbon sources had 1⁻3 typical diffraction peaks, and the highest crystallinity (i.e., 90%) was found for BC produced from mannitol. Similarly, several typical spectra bands obtained by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were similar for the BCs produced from different carbon sources, as was the fraction. The genome annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis revealed that the biochemical transformation pathways associated with the utilization of and BC production from fructose, glucose, glycerol, and mannitol were found in strain W1, but this was not the case for other carbon sources. Our data provides suggestions for further investigations of strain W1 to produce BC by using low molecular weight sugars and gives clues to understand how this strain produces BC based on metabolic pathway analysis.

Citing Articles

Bacterial Cellulose-Silk Hydrogel Biosynthesized by Using Coconut Skim Milk as Culture Medium for Biomedical Applications.

Chaikhunsaeng J, Phatchayawat P, Kirdponpattara S, Phisalaphong M Gels. 2024; 10(11).

PMID: 39590070 PMC: 11593934. DOI: 10.3390/gels10110714.


Impact of Carbon Source on Bacterial Cellulose Network Architecture and Prolonged Lidocaine Release.

Amorim J, Liao K, Mandal A, Costa A, Roumeli E, Sarubbo L Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39518230 PMC: 11548197. DOI: 10.3390/polym16213021.


Citrate-buffered Yamanaka medium allows to produce high-yield bacterial nanocellulose in static culture using strains isolated from apple cider vinegar.

Nunez D, Oyarzun P, Caceres R, Elgueta E, Gamboa M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1375984.

PMID: 38812914 PMC: 11133569. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1375984.


Production of bacterial cellulose from glycerol: the current state and perspectives.

Zikmanis P, Kolesovs S, Ruklisha M, Semjonovs P Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024; 8(1):116.

PMID: 38650300 PMC: 10992469. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-021-00468-1.


Whole genome sequencing analysis of Komagataeibacter nataicola reveals its potential in food waste valorisation for cellulose production.

Nasharudin M, Siew S, Ahmad H, Mahmud N Mol Biol Rep. 2024; 51(1):503.

PMID: 38600404 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-024-09492-8.


References
1.
Reiniati I, Hrymak A, Margaritis A . Recent developments in the production and applications of bacterial cellulose fibers and nanocrystals. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016; 37(4):510-524. DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2016.1189871. View

2.
Jin X, Xiang Z, Liu Q, Chen Y, Lu F . Polyethyleneimine-bacterial cellulose bioadsorbent for effective removal of copper and lead ions from aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol. 2017; 244(Pt 1):844-849. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.072. View

3.
HESTRIN S, Schramm M . Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J. 1954; 58(2):345-52. PMC: 1269899. DOI: 10.1042/bj0580345. View

4.
Thorat M, Dastager S . High yield production of cellulose by a PG2 strain isolated from pomegranate as a new host. RSC Adv. 2022; 8(52):29797-29805. PMC: 9085265. DOI: 10.1039/c8ra05295f. View

5.
Ling S, Chen W, Fan Y, Zheng K, Jin K, Yu H . Biopolymer nanofibrils: structure, modeling, preparation, and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2020; 85:1-56. PMC: 6948189. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.06.004. View