» Articles » PMID: 30960449

Slip-Spring and Kink Dynamics Models for Fast Extensional Flow of Entangled Polymeric Fluids

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Apr 10
PMID 30960449
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We combine a slip-spring model with an 'entangled kink dynamics' (EKD) model for strong uniaxial extensional flows (with Rouse Weissenberg number W i R ≫ 1 ) of long ( M w > 1   Mkg / mol for polystyrene) entangled polymers in solutions and melts. The slip-spring model captures the dynamics up to the formation of a 'kinked' or folded state, while the kink dynamics simulation tracks the dynamics from that point forward to complete extension. We show that a single-chain slip-spring model using affine motion of the slip-spring anchor points produces unrealistically high tension near the center of the chain once the Hencky strain exceeds around unity or so, exceeding the maximum tension that a chain entangled with a second chain is able to support. This unrealistic tension is alleviated by pairing the slip links on one chain with those on a second chain, and allowing some of the large tension on one of the two to be transferred to the second chain, producing non-affine motion of each. This explicit pairing of entanglements mimics the entanglement pairing also used in the EKD model, and allows the slip spring simulations to be carried out to strains high enough for the EKD model to become valid. We show that results nearly equivalent to those from paired chains are obtained in a single-chain slip-spring simulation by simply specifying that the tension in a slip spring cannot exceed the theoretical maximum value of ζ ' ϵ ˙ L 2 / 8 where ζ ' , ϵ ˙ and L are the friction per unit length, strain rate and contour length of the chain, respectively. The effects of constraint release (CR) and regeneration of entanglements is also studied and found to have little effect on the chain statistics up to the formation of the kinked state. The resulting hybrid model provides a fast, simple, simulation method to study the response of high molecular weight ( M w > 1   Mkg / mol ) polymers in fast flows ( W i R ≫ 1 ), where conventional simulation techniques are less applicable due to computational cost.

Citing Articles

The Work of Mechanical Degradation in Elongating Polymer Melts.

Chongvimansin N, OConnor T Macromolecules. 2025; 58(4):1787-1794.

PMID: 40026449 PMC: 11866932. DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02063.


Mixed-flow design for microfluidic printing of two-component polymer semiconductor systems.

Wang G, Feng L, Huang W, Mukherjee S, Chen Y, Shen D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(30):17551-17557.

PMID: 32647062 PMC: 7395453. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2000398117.


Developments in Polymer Theory and Simulation.

Kroger M Polymers (Basel). 2019; 12(1).

PMID: 31877990 PMC: 7023532. DOI: 10.3390/polym12010030.


Slip-Spring and Kink Dynamics Models for Fast Extensional Flow of Entangled Polymeric Fluids.

Moghadam S, Dalal I, Larson R Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11(3).

PMID: 30960449 PMC: 6473671. DOI: 10.3390/polym11030465.

References
1.
Hsu H, Kremer K . Primitive Path Analysis and Stress Distribution in Highly Strained Macromolecules. ACS Macro Lett. 2018; 7(1):107-111. PMC: 5828704. DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00808. View

2.
Yaoita T, Isaki T, Masubuchi Y, Watanabe H, Ianniruberto G, Greco F . Statics, linear, and nonlinear dynamics of entangled polystyrene melts simulated through the primitive chain network model. J Chem Phys. 2008; 128(15):154901. DOI: 10.1063/1.2899653. View

3.
Moghadam S, Dalal I, Larson R . Slip-Spring and Kink Dynamics Models for Fast Extensional Flow of Entangled Polymeric Fluids. Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11(3). PMC: 6473671. DOI: 10.3390/polym11030465. View

4.
Schieber J, Andreev M . Entangled polymer dynamics in equilibrium and flow modeled through slip links. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2014; 5:367-81. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040252. View

5.
Doi M, Takimoto J . Molecular modelling of entanglement. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2003; 361(1805):641-52. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1168. View