» Articles » PMID: 30955055

Perineal Ultrasound for the Measurement of Urethral Mobility: a Study of Inter- and Intra-observer Reliability

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Apr 8
PMID 30955055
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Hypothesis: Ultrasound measurement of urethral mobility is an attractive approach to directly visualize bladder neck descent (BND) during stress. BND assessed by transperineal ultrasound appears to be associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) severity. This study evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reliability of ultrasound BND measurement and its correlation with clinical examination.

Methods: We included 50 women from the multicenter randomized 3PN study ("Prenatal Perineal Prevention"). BND was measured by two operators either during pregnancy (at 20 weeks of gestation) or 2 months after delivery. Two measurements were taken by each operator. Intra-class coefficient correlations were used for analysis. Urethral mobility was clinically assessed by measuring the point Aa of the POP-Q classification during maximum strain (Valsalva maneuver) with an empty bladder.

Results: Ultrasound analysis showed high intra-observer reliability in the overall population: intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0.75 (0.59-0.85) and 0.73 (0.55-0.84) for each operator. Intra-observer agreements were considered moderate to high in the post- and antepartum groups. Inter-observer agreements were moderate in the antepartum period [ICC = 0.58 (0.26-0.78) for the first measurement and 0.68 (0.42-0.84) for the second] but low in the postpartum period [ICC = 0.15 (0.10-0.41) and 0.21 (0.10-0.58)]. Correlations between ultrasound and clinical measurements were considered low to moderate (Spearman coefficient, rho = 0.34 and 0.50 for post- and antepartum periods, respectively).

Conclusions: Inter-observer reliability of ultrasound urethral mobility measurements by the transperineal route is moderate antepartum and low postpartum. The correlation with point Aa is low to moderate.

Citing Articles

Comparison of urethral parameters in females presenting cystoceles with and without stress urinary incontinence based on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: are they different?.

Tang L, Liang S, Chen C, Feng J, Chen L, Peng C Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(8):2902-2912.

PMID: 38498153 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04175-7.


The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence cases.

Turkoglu A, Erturk Coskun A, Arinkan S, Vural F Int Braz J Urol. 2021; 48(1):70-77.

PMID: 34528775 PMC: 8691236. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1100.


Can the inability to contract the pelvic floor muscles influence the severity of urinary incontinence symptoms in females?.

Petter Rodrigues M, Laureano Paiva L, Mallmann S, Bessel T, Geraldo Lopes Ramos J Int Urogynecol J. 2021; 33(5):1193-1197.

PMID: 34170343 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04880-1.


Artificial intelligence models derived from 2D transperineal ultrasound images in the clinical diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence.

Zhang M, Lin X, Zheng Z, Chen Y, Ren Y, Zhang X Int Urogynecol J. 2021; 33(5):1179-1185.

PMID: 34028577 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04859-y.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Wlazlak E, Kluz T, Kociszewski J, Frachowicz K, Janowska M, Wlazlak W . The analysis of repeatability and reproducibility of bladder neck mobility measurements obtained during pelvic floor sonography performed introitally with 2D transvaginal probe. Ginekol Pol. 2017; 88(7):360-365. DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0068. View

3.
Peschers U, Fanger G, Schaer G, Vodusek D, DeLancey J, Schuessler B . Bladder neck mobility in continent nulliparous women. BJOG. 2001; 108(3):320-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00066.x. View

4.
Creighton S, Pearce J, Stanton S . Perineal video-ultrasonography in the assessment of vaginal prolapse: early observations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992; 99(4):310-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13729.x. View

5.
Noblett K, Lane F, Driskill C . Does pelvic organ prolapse quantification exam predict urethral mobility in stages 0 and I prolapse?. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005; 16(4):268-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1315-4. View