» Articles » PMID: 30948575

Reporting Quality of the Delphi Technique in Reporting Guidelines: a Protocol for a Systematic Analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Apr 6
PMID 30948575
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Reporting guidelines are important tools for improving the quality of medical research. The Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network's Library contains a comprehensive and up-to-date database of reporting guidelines relevant to health research. Only 31% of reporting guidelines published from 2010 to 2014 reported using the Delphi technique, and the reporting quality of the Delphi technique in reporting guidelines is unknown even though the use of the Delphi technique was recommended in the guidance for reporting guidelines. We will assess the quality reports of the Delphi technique or modified Delphi technique in reporting guidelines.

Methods And Analysis: The present study is a systematic analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library. We will include all reporting guidelines in the EQUATOR Network that used the Delphi technique or modified Delphi technique, published since 1 January 2011 and registered in the EQUATOR on or before 31 May 2018. Our primary outcome is the reporting quality of the Delphi technique, measured by the quality score (each item) in the Delphi technique. We will also examine the relationship between the reporting quality score (each item) of the Delphi technique and year of publication, number of authors, impact factor, sources of funding (industry, non-industry), multiple publications and whether the guidelines are published in open access policy.

Ethics And Dissemination: Ethics approval will not be applicable for this study. This protocol has been registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and may also present them at conferences.

Trial Registration Number: UMIN000032685.

Citing Articles

Establishing primary care physician commitment in Canadian long-term care homes: a protocol for a modified e-Delphi study.

Dash D, Potter M, Siu H, Quail P, Katz P, McCarthy L BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e093277.

PMID: 39920077 PMC: 11808892. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093277.


Development of the assessment standards of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Geriatric Core Set through a modified Delphi method.

Zhang M, Gao Y, Xue J, Li K, Zhang L, Yu J BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):239.

PMID: 38454354 PMC: 10921752. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04816-6.


The ESA Parastronaut Feasibility Project: Investigating the Need and Contents of Physical Performance Tests for an Inclusive European Astronaut Corps.

Wiedmann I, Weerts G, Brixius K, Seemuller A, Mittelstadt J, Herssens N Sports Med. 2023; 53(11):2267-2280.

PMID: 37747665 PMC: 10587332. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01891-4.


Development of practice-based quality indicators for the primary care of older adults: a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method study protocol.

Correia R, Siu H, Vanstone M, Jones A, Gopaul A, Costa A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(9):e072232.

PMID: 37699633 PMC: 10503316. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072232.


The development of the People with Aphasia and Other Layperson Involvement (PAOLI) framework for guiding patient and public involvement (PPI) in aphasia research.

Charalambous M, Kountouri A, Schwyter J, Annoni J, Kambanaros M Res Involv Engagem. 2023; 9(1):74.

PMID: 37658465 PMC: 10474738. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00484-9.


References
1.
Hutchings A, Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N . A comparison of formal consensus methods used for developing clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006; 11(4):218-24. DOI: 10.1258/135581906778476553. View

2.
Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, Wood T . Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research. Med Teach. 2016; 39(1):14-19. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856. View

3.
Gagliardi A, Fung Kee Fung M, Langer B, Stern H, Brown A . Development of ovarian cancer surgery quality indicators using a modified Delphi approach. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 97(2):446-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.12.059. View

4.
Black N, Murphy M, Lamping D, McKee M, Sanderson C, Askham J . Consensus development methods: a review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000; 4(4):236-48. DOI: 10.1177/135581969900400410. View

5.
Kanda Y . Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012; 48(3):452-8. PMC: 3590441. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244. View