Primary Care Physicians' Decision-making Processes in the Context of Multimorbidity: Protocol of a Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2019 Apr 6

PMID 30948566

Citations 3

Authors

David Silverio Rodrigues

Paulo Faria Sousa

Nuno Basilio

Ana Antunes

Maria da Luz Antunes

Maria Isabel Santos

Bruno Heleno

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians' capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians' perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity.

Methods And Analysis: This will be a systematic review of qualitative research where PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science will be searched, supplemented with manual searches of reference lists of included studies. Qualitative studies published in Portuguese, Spanish and English language will be included, with no date limit. Studies will be eligible when they evaluate family physicians' perspectives, opinions or perceptions on decision-making for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. The methodological quality of studies selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers before inclusion in the review using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic synthesis will be used to identify key categories and themes from the qualitative data. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach will be used to assess how much confidence to place in findings from the qualitative evidence synthesis.

Ethics And Dissemination: This review will use published data. No ethical issues are foreseen. The findings will be disseminated to the medical community via journal publication and conference presentation(s).

Prospero Registration Number: ID 91978.

Citing Articles

Explainable predictions of a machine learning model to forecast the postoperative length of stay for severe patients: machine learning model development and evaluation.

Cho H, Ahn I, Gwon H, Kang H, Kim Y, Seo H BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):350.

PMID: 39563368 PMC: 11577810. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02755-1.

Physicians' experiences and actions in making complex level-of-care decisions during acute situations within older patients' homes: a critical incident study.

Forsgarde E, Roost M, Elmqvist C, Fridlund B, Svensson A BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):323.

PMID: 37226161 PMC: 10206590. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04037-3.

Quality use of diagnostic imaging in trauma, and the impact on emergency medical practice-a retrospective clinical audit.

Klein R, Velan G, Young N, Shetty A, Moscova M Emerg Radiol. 2021; 28(4):761-770.

PMID: 33638062 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-021-01921-6.

References

Benoot C, Hannes K, Bilsen J . The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16:21. PMC: 4757966. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0114-6. View

Hughes L, McMurdo M, Guthrie B . Guidelines for people not for diseases: the challenges of applying UK clinical guidelines to people with multimorbidity. Age Ageing. 2012; 42(1):62-9. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afs100. View

Djulbegovic B, Elqayam S . Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017; 23(5):915-922. PMC: 5655784. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12788. View

Nicholson K, Makovski T, Griffith L, Raina P, Stranges S, van den Akker M . Multimorbidity and comorbidity revisited: refining the concepts for international health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 105:142-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.008. View

Lambe K, OReilly G, Kelly B, Curristan S . Dual-process cognitive interventions to enhance diagnostic reasoning: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; 25(10):808-20. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004417. View

Tay S, Ryan P, Ryan C . Systems 1 and 2 thinking processes and cognitive reflection testing in medical students. Can Med Educ J. 2017; 7(2):e97-e103. PMC: 5344059. View

Jenicek M, Croskerry P, Hitchcock D . Evidence and its uses in health care and research: the role of critical thinking. Med Sci Monit. 2010; 17(1):RA12-7. PMC: 3524675. DOI: 10.12659/msm.881321. View

Tversky A, Kahneman D . Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science. 1974; 185(4157):1124-31. DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. View

Smith S, OKelly S, ODowd T . GPs' and pharmacists' experiences of managing multimorbidity: a 'Pandora's box'. Br J Gen Pract. 2010; 60(576):285-94. PMC: 2894403. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X514756. View

10.

Braithwaite R, Fiellin D, Justice A . The payoff time: a flexible framework to help clinicians decide when patients with comorbid disease are not likely to benefit from practice guidelines. Med Care. 2009; 47(6):610-7. PMC: 3077952. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819748d5. View

11.

Bower P, MacDonald W, Harkness E, Gask L, Kendrick T, Valderas J . Multimorbidity, service organization and clinical decision making in primary care: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2011; 28(5):579-87. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmr018. View

12.

Tinetti M, Fried T . The end of the disease era. Am J Med. 2004; 116(3):179-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.031. View

13.

Croskerry P . From mindless to mindful practice--cognitive bias and clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(26):2445-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1303712. View

14.

Saposnik G, Redelmeier D, Ruff C, Tobler P . Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16(1):138. PMC: 5093937. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1. View

15.

Wyatt K, Stuart L, Brito J, Leon B, Domecq J, Prutsky G . Out of context: clinical practice guidelines and patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review. Med Care. 2013; 52 Suppl 3:S92-S100. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a51b3d. View

16.

Tong A, Flemming K, Mcinnes E, Oliver S, Craig J . Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:181. PMC: 3552766. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181. View

17.

Tinetti M, Fried T, Boyd C . Designing health care for the most common chronic condition--multimorbidity. JAMA. 2012; 307(23):2493-4. PMC: 4083627. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.5265. View

18.

Wallace E, Salisbury C, Guthrie B, Lewis C, Fahey T, Smith S . Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care. BMJ. 2015; 350:h176. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h176. View

19.

Zulman D, Sussman J, Chen X, Cigolle C, Blaum C, Hayward R . Examining the evidence: a systematic review of the inclusion and analysis of older adults in randomized controlled trials. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26(7):783-90. PMC: 3138606. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1629-x. View

20.

Berwick D . Era 3 for Medicine and Health Care. JAMA. 2016; 315(13):1329-30. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.1509. View