» Articles » PMID: 21169920

Evidence and Its Uses in Health Care and Research: the Role of Critical Thinking

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2010 Dec 21
PMID 21169920
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Obtaining and critically appraising evidence is clearly not enough to make better decisions in clinical care. The evidence should be linked to the clinician's expertise, the patient's individual circumstances (including values and preferences), and clinical context and settings. We propose critical thinking and decision-making as the tools for making that link. Critical thinking is also called for in medical research and medical writing, especially where pre-canned methodologies are not enough. It is also involved in our exchanges of ideas at floor rounds, grand rounds and case discussions; our communications with patients and lay stakeholders in health care; and our writing of research papers, grant applications and grant reviews. Critical thinking is a learned process which benefits from teaching and guided practice like any discipline in health sciences. Training in critical thinking should be a part or a pre-requisite of the medical curriculum.

Citing Articles

Applying digital storytelling in the medical oncology curriculum: Effects on students' achievement and critical thinking.

Zarei A, Mojtahedzadeh R, Mohammadi A, Sandars J, Emami S Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 70:102528.

PMID: 34540209 PMC: 8441090. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102528.


The collaborative learning development exercise (CLeD-EX): an educational instrument to promote key collaborative learning behaviours in medical students.

Iqbal M, Velan G, OSullivan A, Balasooriya C BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20(1):62.

PMID: 32122344 PMC: 7052979. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-1977-0.


Development and validation of the critical thinking disposition inventory for Chinese medical college students (CTDI-M).

Wang X, Sun X, Huang T, He R, Hao W, Zhang L BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19(1):200.

PMID: 31196183 PMC: 6567520. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1593-z.


Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research.

Silverio Rodrigues D, Sousa P, Basilio N, Antunes A, Antunes M, Santos M BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e023832.

PMID: 30948566 PMC: 6500233. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832.


Gating the holes in the Swiss cheese (part I): Expanding professor Reason's model for patient safety.

Seshia S, Young G, Makhinson M, Smith P, Stobart K, Croskerry P J Eval Clin Pract. 2017; 24(1):187-197.

PMID: 29168290 PMC: 5901035. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12847.


References
1.
Jenicek M . How to read, understand, and write 'Discussion' sections in medical articles. An exercise in critical thinking. Med Sci Monit. 2006; 12(6):SR28-36. View

2.
Feinstein A . What kind of basic science for clinical medicine?. N Engl J Med. 1970; 283(16):847-52. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197010152831605. View

3.
Brancati F . The art of pimping. JAMA. 1989; 262(1):89-90. View

4.
Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray J, Haynes R, Richardson W . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996; 312(7023):71-2. PMC: 2349778. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. View

5.
Jenicek M . Towards evidence-based critical thinking medicine? Uses of best evidence in flawless argumentations. Med Sci Monit. 2006; 12(8):RA149-53. View