» Articles » PMID: 30945281

Insectivorous Bats Integrate Social Information About Species Identity, Conspecific Activity and Prey Abundance to Estimate Cost-benefit Ratio of Interactions

Overview
Journal J Anim Ecol
Date 2019 Apr 5
PMID 30945281
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animals can use inadvertent social information to improve fitness-relevant decisions, for instance about where to forage or with whom to interact. Since bats emit high-amplitude species-specific echolocation calls when flying, they provide a constant flow of inadvertent social information to others who can decode that acoustic information. Of particular interest is the rate of feeding buzzes-characteristic call sequences preceding any prey capture-which correlates with insect abundance. Previous studies investigating eavesdropping in bats yielded very different and in part contradictory results likely because they commonly focused on single species only, differed substantially in playback buzz rate and did usually not account for (baseline) conspecific activity. Our goal was to overcome these limitations and systematically test which inadvertent social information bats integrate when eavesdropping on others and how this integration affects space use and both intra- and interspecific interactions, respectively. We used a community-wide approach and investigated the effects of a broad range of playback feeding buzz rates and conspecific activity on eavesdropping responses in 24 bat species combinations in the wild. For the first time, we reveal that finely graded and density-dependent eavesdropping responses are not limited to particular foraging styles or call types, but instead are ubiquitous among insectivorous bats. All bats integrated social information about calling species identity, prey abundance and conspecific activity to estimate the cost-benefit ratio of prospective interactions, yet in a species-specific manner. The effect of buzz rate was multifaceted, as bats responded differently to different buzz rates, and responses were additionally modulated by heterospecific recognition. Conspecific activity, in contrast, had a negative effect on the eavesdropping responses of all bats. These findings can explain the inconsistent results of previous studies and advance our understanding of the complex nature of conspecific and heterospecific interactions within bat communities. A comprehensive understanding of how bats incorporate social information into their decision-making will help researchers to explain species distribution patterns and eventually to unravel mechanisms of species coexistence.

Citing Articles

Calibrated microphone array recordings reveal that a gleaning bat emits low-intensity echolocation calls even in open-space habitat.

de Framond L, Beleyur T, Lewanzik D, Goerlitz H J Exp Biol. 2023; 226(18).

PMID: 37655585 PMC: 10560550. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.245801.


Spatial and temporal activity patterns among sympatric tree-roosting bat species in an agriculturally dominated great plains landscape.

Fill C, Allen C, Benson J, Twidwell D PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0286621.

PMID: 37267398 PMC: 10237643. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286621.


Effectiveness of acoustic lures for increasing tropical forest understory bat captures.

Aylen O, Bishop P, Bin Haji Abd Wahab R, Grafe T Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(4):e8775.

PMID: 35386871 PMC: 8969924. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8775.


Social foraging in vampire bats is predicted by long-term cooperative relationships.

Ripperger S, Carter G PLoS Biol. 2021; 19(9):e3001366.

PMID: 34555014 PMC: 8460024. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001366.


Social calls influence the foraging behavior in wild big-footed myotis.

Guo D, Ding J, Liu H, Zhou L, Feng J, Luo B Front Zool. 2021; 18(1):3.

PMID: 33413435 PMC: 7791762. DOI: 10.1186/s12983-020-00384-8.


References
1.
Gillam E, Ulanovsky N, McCracken G . Rapid jamming avoidance in biosonar. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1610):651-60. PMC: 2197216. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0047. View

2.
Dechmann D, Heucke S, Giuggioli L, Safi K, Voigt C, Wikelski M . Experimental evidence for group hunting via eavesdropping in echolocating bats. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276(1668):2721-8. PMC: 2839959. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0473. View

3.
Cvikel N, Egert Berg K, Levin E, Hurme E, Borissov I, Boonman A . Bats aggregate to improve prey search but might be impaired when their density becomes too high. Curr Biol. 2015; 25(2):206-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.010. View

4.
Dorado-Correa A, Goerlitz H, Siemers B . Interspecific acoustic recognition in two European bat communities. Front Physiol. 2013; 4:192. PMC: 3753017. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00192. View

5.
Goerlitz H . Weather conditions determine attenuation and speed of sound: Environmental limitations for monitoring and analyzing bat echolocation. Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(10):5090-5100. PMC: 5980448. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4088. View