» Articles » PMID: 30943453

Modeling Meiotic Chromosome Pairing: a Tug of War Between Telomere Forces and a Pairing-based Brownian Ratchet Leads to Increased Pairing Fidelity

Overview
Journal Phys Biol
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2019 Apr 4
PMID 30943453
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Meiotic homolog pairing involves associations between homologous DNA regions scattered along the length of a chromosome. When homologs associate, they tend to do so by a processive zippering process, which apparently results from avidity effects. Using a computational model, we show that this avidity-driven processive zippering reduces the selectivity of pairing. When active random forces are applied to telomeres, this drop in selectivity is eliminated in a force-dependent manner. Further simulations suggest that active telomere forces are engaged in a tug-of-war against zippering, which can be interpreted as a Brownian ratchet with a stall force that depends on the dissociation constant of pairing. When perfectly homologous regions of high affinity compete with homeologous regions of lower affinity, the affinity difference can be amplified through this tug of war effect provided the telomere force acts in a range that is strong enough to oppose zippering of homeologs while still permitting zippering of correct homologs. The degree of unzippering depends on the radius of the nucleus, such that complete unzippering of homeologous regions can only take place if the nucleus is large enough to pull the two chromosomes completely apart. A picture of meiotic pairing thus emerges that is fundamentally mechanical in nature, possibly explaining the purpose of active telomere forces, increased nuclear diameter, and the presence of 'Maverick' chromosomes in meiosis.

Citing Articles

Agent-based modeling of nuclear chromosome ensembles identifies determinants of homolog pairing during meiosis.

Chriss A, Borner G, Ryan S PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(5):e1011416.

PMID: 38739641 PMC: 11115365. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011416.


Modeling homologous chromosome recognition via nonspecific interactions.

Marshall W, Fung J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(20):e2317373121.

PMID: 38722810 PMC: 11098084. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2317373121.


Agent-based modeling of nuclear chromosome ensemble identifies determinants of homolog pairing during meiosis.

Chriss A, Borner G, Ryan S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38260664 PMC: 10802385. DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.09.552574.


Beyond tradition: exploring the non-canonical functions of telomeres in meiosis.

Fernandez-Alvarez A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1278571.

PMID: 38020928 PMC: 10679444. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1278571.


Modeling cell biological features of meiotic chromosome pairing to study interlock resolution.

J Navarro E, Marshall W, Fung J PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(6):e1010252.

PMID: 35696428 PMC: 9232156. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010252.


References
1.
Chikashige Y, Ding D, Funabiki H, Haraguchi T, Mashiko S, Yanagida M . Telomere-led premeiotic chromosome movement in fission yeast. Science. 1994; 264(5156):270-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.8146661. View

2.
Phillips C, Dernburg A . A family of zinc-finger proteins is required for chromosome-specific pairing and synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 2006; 11(6):817-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.020. View

3.
Natkanski E, Lee W, Mistry B, Casal A, Molloy J, Tolar P . B cells use mechanical energy to discriminate antigen affinities. Science. 2013; 340(6140):1587-90. PMC: 3713314. DOI: 10.1126/science.1237572. View

4.
Zickler D . Development of the synaptonemal complex and the "recombination nodules" during meiotic prophase in the seven bivalents of the fungus Sordaria macrospora Auersw. Chromosoma. 1977; 61(4):289-316. DOI: 10.1007/BF00288615. View

5.
Speil J, Kubitscheck U . Single ovalbumin molecules exploring nucleoplasm and nucleoli of living cell nuclei. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009; 1803(3):396-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.10.010. View