» Articles » PMID: 30942833

Multi-Polygenic Score Approach to Identifying Individual Vulnerabilities Associated With the Risk of Exposure to Bullying

Overview
Journal JAMA Psychiatry
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2019 Apr 4
PMID 30942833
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Exposure to bullying is a prevalent experience with adverse consequences throughout the life span. Individual vulnerabilities and traits, such as preexisting mental health problems, may be associated with increased likelihood of experiencing bullying. Identifying such individual vulnerabilities and traits is essential for a better understanding of the etiology of exposure to bullying and for tailoring effective prevention.

Objective: To identify individual vulnerabilities and traits associated with exposure to bullying in childhood and adolescence.

Design, Setting, And Participants: For this study, data were drawn from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a population-based birth cohort study. The initial ALSPAC sample consisted of 14 062 children born to women residing in Avon, United Kingdom, with an expected date of delivery between April 1, 1991, and December 31, 1992. Collection of the ALSPAC data began in September 6, 1990, and the last follow-up assessment of exposure to bullying was conducted when participants were 13 years of age. Data analysis was conducted from November 1, 2017, to January 1, 2019.

Exposures: The polygenic score approach was used to derive genetic proxies that indexed vulnerabilities and traits. A total of 35 polygenic scores were computed for a range of mental health vulnerabilities (eg, depression) and traits related to cognition (eg, intelligence), personality (eg, neuroticism), and physical measures (eg, body mass index), as well as negative controls (eg, osteoporosis).

Main Outcomes And Measures: Single and multi-polygenic score regression models were fitted to test the association between indexed traits and exposure to bullying. Children completed the Bullying and Friendship Interview Schedule at the ages of 8, 10, and 13 years. A mean score of exposure to bullying across ages was used as the main outcome.

Results: A total of 5028 genotyped individuals (2481 boys and 2547 girls) with data on exposure to bullying were included. Among the 35 initially included polygenic scores, 11 were independently associated with exposure to bullying; no significant association was detected for the 24 remaining scores. In multivariable analyses, 5 polygenic scores were associated with exposure to bullying; the largest associations were present for genetic risk relating to mental health vulnerabilities, including diagnosis of depression (standardized b = 0.065; 95% CI, 0.035-0.095) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (standardized b = 0.063; 95% CI, 0.035-0.091), followed by risk taking (standardized b = 0.041; 95% CI, 0.013-0.069), body mass index (standardized b = 0.036; 95% CI, 0.008-0.064), and intelligence (standardized b = -0.031; 95% CI, -0.059 to 0.003).

Conclusion And Relevance: Using the multi-polygenic score approach, the findings implicate preexisting mental health vulnerabilities as risk factors for exposure to bullying. A mechanistic understanding of how these vulnerabilities link to exposure of bullying is important to inform prevention strategies.

Citing Articles

Genetic and environment influences on childhood victimization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dahoun T, Peel A, Baldwin J, Coleman O, Lewis S, Wertz J Mol Psychiatry. 2024; .

PMID: 39663379 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02868-z.


Association between bullying victimization and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a population-based, genetically informative study.

Pol-Fuster J, Fernandez de la Cruz L, Isomura K, Sidorchuk A, Kuja-Halkola R, Lichtenstein P Mol Psychiatry. 2024; .

PMID: 39580606 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02849-2.


What Happens to Children's Mental Health and Peer Relationships During Periods of Restricted and Unrestricted Social Interactions? Results From the Co-SPACE Study in Primary School-Aged Children.

Guzman Holst C, Oncioiu S, Creswell C, Bowes L JAACAP Open. 2024; 1(2):128-140.

PMID: 39555049 PMC: 11562425. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.05.003.


Personality changes during adolescence predict young adult psychosis proneness and mediate gene-environment interplays of schizophrenia risk.

Antonucci L, Raio A, Kikidis G, Bertolino A, Rampino A, Banaschewski T Psychol Med. 2024; :1-11.

PMID: 39465647 PMC: 11578906. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002198.


The healthy context paradox: a cross-country analysis of the association between bullying victimisation and adolescent mental health.

Odigie T, Elsden E, Hosozawa M, Patalay P, Pingault J Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024; 34(1):215-224.

PMID: 38832961 PMC: 11805777. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-024-02483-x.


References
1.
Modecki K, Minchin J, Harbaugh A, Guerra N, Runions K . Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health. 2014; 55(5):602-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007. View

2.
Vaillancourt T, Brittain H, McDougall P, Duku E . Longitudinal links between childhood peer victimization, internalizing and externalizing problems, and academic functioning: developmental cascades. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013; 41(8):1203-15. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-013-9781-5. View

3.
Euesden J, Lewis C, OReilly P . PRSice: Polygenic Risk Score software. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(9):1466-8. PMC: 4410663. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu848. View

4.
Power R, Verweij K, Zuhair M, Montgomery G, Henders A, Heath A . Genetic predisposition to schizophrenia associated with increased use of cannabis. Mol Psychiatry. 2014; 19(11):1201-4. PMC: 4382963. DOI: 10.1038/mp.2014.51. View

5.
Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I . Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res. 2001; 125(1-2):279-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00297-2. View