Touch-up and Recurrence Rates After Voltage Mapping for Verification of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Following Cryoablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Overview

Journal J Interv Card Electrophysiol

Publisher Springer

Date 2019 Apr 4

PMID 30941631

Citations 1

Authors

Rajesh Malik

Bobby Malik

Tina D Hunter

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The procedural endpoint following cryoballoon ablation (CA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), which is typically confirmed by entrance/exit block using a circular mapping catheter. The present study added an assessment of ablation gaps with high-density voltage mapping after standard confirmation of PVI. Relationships between the need for touch-up ablation, patient characteristics, and atrial arrhythmia recurrence were explored.

Methods: PAF patients received CA through standard of care treatment, with PVI assessed by bidirectional block confirmation, followed by voltage mapping. Radiofrequency ablation was performed as needed for voltage breakthrough and or additional rhythms. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence through 12-month follow-up was analyzed retrospectively with statistical survival models.

Results: A total of 77 PAF patients (age 66.1 ± 11.6, CHADS 1.8 ± 1.0) were followed for 1.2 ± 0.3 years after CA. During the index procedure, pulmonary vein (PV) touch-up was required in 59 patients (76.6%) and ablation of additional atrial fibrillation targets beyond PV was required in 26 patients (33.8%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 1 year were 62 ± 6%. Rates were lower for patients requiring touch-up ablation (58 ± 6% vs. 78 ± 10%) or with CHADS scores > 2 (33 ± 12% vs. 69 ± 6%). Cox regression models showed that the need for touch-up ablation increased recurrence (p = .045, HR = 2.6) after adjusting for hypertension and heart failure.

Conclusion: The high rate of PV touch-up suggests that initial CA lesions may be less durable than previously assumed, while the higher recurrence rate in patients requiring touch-up may indicate that additional factors make these patients more difficult to treat.

Citing Articles

One-year outcomes of wide antral cryoballoon ablation guided by high-density mapping vs. conventional cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched study.

Chen S, Wang Z, Xuan F, Liang M, Jin Z, Ding J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1327639.

PMID: 38361587 PMC: 10867262. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1327639.

References

Calkins H, Kuck K, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm A, Chen S . 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial.... Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9(4):632-696.e21. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.016. View

Sultan A, Luker J, Andresen D, Kuck K, Hoffmann E, Brachmann J . Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: Data from the German Ablation Registry. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):16678. PMC: 5709464. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16938-6. View

Masuda M, Fujita M, Iida O, Okamoto S, Ishihara T, Nanto K . Left atrial low-voltage areas predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 257:97-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.089. View

Kottkamp H, Berg J, Bender R, Rieger A, Schreiber D . Box Isolation of Fibrotic Areas (BIFA): A Patient-Tailored Substrate Modification Approach for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 27(1):22-30. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12870. View

Reddy V, Neuzil P, dAvila A, Laragy M, Malchano Z, Kralovec S . Balloon catheter ablation to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: what is the level of pulmonary venous isolation?. Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5(3):353-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.11.006. View

Fioravanti F, Brisinda D, Sorbo A, Lombardi G, La Brocca L, Fenici R . Compliance in weight control reduces atrial fibrillation worsening: A retrospective cohort study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017; 27(8):711-716. DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.04.007. View

Bunch T, May H, Bair T, Crandall B, Cutler M, Jacobs V . Long-term influence of body mass index on cardiovascular events after atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016; 46(3):259-65. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-016-0142-5. View

Kuhne M, Suter Y, Altmann D, Ammann P, Schaer B, Osswald S . Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: biomarkers of myocardial injury, recurrence rates, and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7(12):1770-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.08.028. View

Wei H, Guo X, Zhou G, Sun Q, Liu X, Yang J . Pulmonary vein isolation with real-time pulmonary vein potential recording using second-generation cryoballoon: Procedural and biophysical predictors of acute pulmonary vein reconnection. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017; 41(1):14-21. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13230. View

10.

Buiatti A, von Olshausen G, Barthel P, Schneider S, Luik A, Kaess B . Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. Europace. 2016; 19(3):378-384. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw262. View

11.

Weerasooriya R, Khairy P, Litalien J, Macle L, Hocini M, Sacher F . Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: are results maintained at 5 years of follow-up?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57(2):160-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.061. View

12.

Conte G, Chierchia G, Sieira J, Levinstein M, Casado-Arroyo R, de Asmundis C . Repeat procedure using radiofrequency energy for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after initial cryoballoon ablation: a 2-year follow-up. Europace. 2013; 15(10):1421-5. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut098. View

13.

Steven D, Sultan A, Reddy V, Luker J, Altenburg M, Hoffmann B . Benefit of pulmonary vein isolation guided by loss of pace capture on the ablation line: results from a prospective 2-center randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.059. View

14.

Ciconte G, Chierchia G, de Asmundis C, Sieira J, Conte G, Julia J . Spontaneous and adenosine-induced pulmonary vein reconnection after cryoballoon ablation with the second-generation device. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25(8):845-851. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12421. View

15.

Kuck K, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun K . Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(23):2235-45. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014. View

16.

Ouyang F, Tilz R, Chun J, Schmidt B, Wissner E, Zerm T . Long-term results of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: lessons from a 5-year follow-up. Circulation. 2010; 122(23):2368-77. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.946806. View

17.

Miyazaki S, Taniguchi H, Hachiya H, Nakamura H, Takagi T, Hirao K . Clinical recurrence and electrical pulmonary vein reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13(9):1852-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.05.025. View

18.

Wojcik M, Berkowitsch A, Zaltsberg S, Hamm C, Pitschner H, Kuniss M . Cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: How important is the proper selection of patients?. Cardiol J. 2015; 22(2):194-200. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0100. View

19.

Lip G, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane D, Crijns H . Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2009; 137(2):263-72. DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-1584. View

20.

Schreiber D, Rieger A, Moser F, Kottkamp H . Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with box isolation of fibrotic areas: Lessons on fibrosis distribution and extent, clinical characteristics, and their impact on long-term outcome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017; 28(9):971-983. DOI: 10.1111/jce.13278. View