» Articles » PMID: 30940176

Device-measured Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Cardiometabolic Health and Fitness Across Occupational Groups: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Apr 4
PMID 30940176
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With approximately 8 hours of one's waking day spent at work, occupational tasks and environments are important influencers on an individual's physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviours. Little research has compared device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic outcomes between occupational groups.

Objective: To compare device-measured movement (sedentary time [ST], light intensity physical activity [LPA], moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity [MVPA], and steps) across occupations. The secondary objective was to examine whether cardiometabolic and fitness outcomes differed by occupation.

Methods: Five bibliographic databases were searched to identify all studies which included working age, employed adults from high-income countries, and reported on device-measured movement within occupations. Risk of bias within and across studies was assessed. Results were synthesized using meta-analyses and narrative syntheses.

Results: The review includes 132 unique studies with data from 15,619 participants. Working adults spent ~ 60% of their working and waking time engaged in sedentary behaviour; a very small proportion (~ 4%) of the day included MVPA. On average, workers accumulated 8124 steps/day. Office and call center workers' steps/day were among the lowest, while those of postal delivery workers were highest. Office workers had the greatest ST and the lowest time in LPA both at work and during wakeful time. However, office workers had the greatest minutes sent in MVPA during wakeful hours. Laborers had the lowest ST and spent a significantly greater proportion of their work time in LPA and MVPA. Healthcare and protective services workers had higher levels of LPA at work compared to other occupations. Workers in driving-based occupations tended to have a higher body mass index and blood pressure.

Conclusion: This review identifies that occupational and wakeful time PA and ST differed between occupations. Future studies are needed to assess whether patterns differ by age and sex, describe leisure-time movement and movement patterns, and the relationship with cardiometabolic health.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42017070448 .

Citing Articles

Promotion of physical activity-related health competence using digital workplace-based health promotion: a pilot study for office workers.

Oppermann L, Dierks M Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1437172.

PMID: 39949561 PMC: 11821944. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1437172.


A digital intervention to reduce home-office workers' sedentary behaviour: protocol for the evaluation of the Click2Move programme, a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Bort-Roig J, Pares-Salomon I, Loef B, Vaque-Crusellas C, Coffey A, Gustems-Morral A BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):387.

PMID: 39885479 PMC: 11783833. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21598-7.


Sitting time at work and cardiovascular disease risk-a longitudinal analysis of the Study on Mental Health at Work (S-MGA).

Schmidt N, Romero Starke K, Sauter M, Burr H, Seidler A, Hegewald J Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2025; 98(1):119-133.

PMID: 39841190 PMC: 11807066. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-024-02118-3.


Are there compensatory behaviors in response to a sit-stand desk intervention?.

Silva H, Teno S, Judice P J Occup Health. 2024; 66(1.

PMID: 39479932 PMC: 11635982. DOI: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae067.


A profile approach to physical activity levels: what's intensity got to do with reasons and motives for exercise?.

Kercher V, Burton D, Kercher K, Heeter K, Brunnemer J, Watkins J BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2990.

PMID: 39472887 PMC: 11520888. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20449-1.


References
1.
Pereira M, Coombes B, Comans T, Johnston V . The impact of onsite workplace health-enhancing physical activity interventions on worker productivity: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2015; 72(6):401-12. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102678. View

2.
Wong J, Gilson N, Bush R, Brown W . Patterns and perceptions of physical activity and sedentary time in male transport drivers working in regional Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014; 38(4):314-20. DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12214. View

3.
Oakman J, Neupane S, Proper K, Kinsman N, Nygard C . Workplace interventions to improve work ability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of their effectiveness. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018; 44(2):134-146. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3685. View

4.
McCrady S, Levine J . Sedentariness at work: how much do we really sit?. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009; 17(11):2103-5. PMC: 2783690. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2009.117. View

5.
Danquah I, Kloster S, Holtermann A, Aadahl M, Tolstrup J . Effects on musculoskeletal pain from "Take a Stand!" - a cluster-randomized controlled trial reducing sitting time among office workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017; 43(4):350-357. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3639. View