» Articles » PMID: 30934001

The Short- and Long-term Effects of Resistance Training with Different Stability Requirements

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Apr 2
PMID 30934001
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term effects of resistance training (RT) with different stability requirements. Fifty-nine men underwent a 3-week familiarization period followed by a 7-week training period. During familiarization, all participants trained four sessions of squats with a Smith machine, free weights and free weights standing on a wobble board. After week-3, participants were randomized into a low (Smith machine), medium (Free-weight) or high (Wobble board) stability RT program, and Control group. All participants were tested pre-, after week-3 and post-intervention. Ten repetition maximum (10RM), rate of force development (RFD), electromyography (EMG) and maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) were tested in all three squat conditions in addition to countermovement jump (CMJ) on stable and unstable surfaces, and muscle thickness. After familiarization, greater 10RM loads (21.8-27.3%), MVIC (7.4-13.5%), RFD (29.7-43.8%) and CMJ (4.9-8.5%) were observed in all conditions. Between week 3 and 10, the Free-weight and Wobble board groups similarly improved 10RM in all conditions. Smith machine group demonstrated greater improvement in the trained exercise than the medium and high stability exercises. All training groups showed similar improvement in muscle thickness, RFD and MVIC. There was no CMJ improvement on the stable surface, but the Wobble board group demonstrated significantly greater improvement on the unstable surface. In conclusion, low, medium or high stability RT resulted in similar improvements in trained and non-trained testing conditions except for greater CMJ on the unstable surface in the Wobble group. Greater 10RM strength in trained than non-trained exercise was only observed in low stability group. Familiarization was associated with substantial improvements in 10RM and CMJ, with greater improvement associated with higher stability requirements. These findings suggest that high stability can increase strength, muscle thickness and explosive measurements similar to training with lower stability.

Citing Articles

A Critical Review of Trunk and Hip Exercise Prescription: Applying Evidence for a Modern Approach.

Short S, Short G, Lehman G, Friesen J, Johnson B Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025; 20(3):448-475.

PMID: 40041532 PMC: 11872577. DOI: 10.26603/001c.129972.


Dynamic modulations of effective brain connectivity associated with postural instability during multi-joint compound movement on compliant surface.

Lehmann T, Visser A, Havers T, Buchel D, Baumeister J Exp Brain Res. 2025; 243(4):80.

PMID: 40029432 PMC: 11876271. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-025-07039-2.


Adaptive changes in bodybuilders in conditions of different energy supply modes and intensity of training load regimes using machine and free weight exercises.

Chernozub A, Manolachi V, Tsos A, Potop V, Korobeynikov G, Manolachi V PeerJ. 2023; 11:e14878.

PMID: 36814958 PMC: 9940642. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14878.


The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women.

Stien N, Andersen V, Engelsrud G, Solstad T, Saeterbakken A BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022; 14(1):163.

PMID: 36056403 PMC: 9438286. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00556-5.


Muscle activation with swinging loads in bench press.

Saeterbakken A, Solstad T, Stien N, Shaw M, Pedersen H, Andersen V PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0239202.

PMID: 32941526 PMC: 7497978. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239202.


References
1.
Behm D, Colado J . The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devices for rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 7(2):226-41. PMC: 3325639. View

2.
Saeterbakken A, van den Tillaar R, Fimland M . A comparison of muscle activity and 1-RM strength of three chest-press exercises with different stability requirements. J Sports Sci. 2011; 29(5):533-8. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2010.543916. View

3.
Behm D, Anderson K, Curnew R . Muscle force and activation under stable and unstable conditions. J Strength Cond Res. 2002; 16(3):416-22. View

4.
Saeterbakken A, Fimland M . Muscle force output and electromyographic activity in squats with various unstable surfaces. J Strength Cond Res. 2012; 27(1):130-6. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182541d43. View

5.
Saeterbakken A, Andersen V, Behm D, Krohn-Hansen E, Smaamo M, Fimland M . Resistance-training exercises with different stability requirements: time course of task specificity. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016; 116(11-12):2247-2256. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3470-3. View