» Articles » PMID: 30921323

Agent-based Modeling of Morphogenetic Systems: Advantages and Challenges

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Mar 29
PMID 30921323
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The complexity of morphogenesis poses a fundamental challenge to understanding the mechanisms governing the formation of biological patterns and structures. Over the past century, numerous processes have been identified as critically contributing to morphogenetic events, but the interplay between the various components and aspects of pattern formation have been much harder to grasp. The combination of traditional biology with mathematical and computational methods has had a profound effect on our current understanding of morphogenesis and led to significant insights and advancements in the field. In particular, the theoretical concepts of reaction-diffusion systems and positional information, proposed by Alan Turing and Lewis Wolpert, respectively, dramatically influenced our general view of morphogenesis, although typically in isolation from one another. In recent years, agent-based modeling has been emerging as a consolidation and implementation of the two theories within a single framework. Agent-based models (ABMs) are unique in their ability to integrate combinations of heterogeneous processes and investigate their respective dynamics, especially in the context of spatial phenomena. In this review, we highlight the benefits and technical challenges associated with ABMs as tools for examining morphogenetic events. These models display unparalleled flexibility for studying various morphogenetic phenomena at multiple levels and have the important advantage of informing future experimental work, including the targeted engineering of tissues and organs.

Citing Articles

Emergent Tissue Shapes from the Regulatory Feedback between Morphogens and Cell Growth.

Kaity B, Lobo D bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027769 PMC: 11870555. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.16.638504.


Deciphering the interplay between biology and physics with a finite element method-implemented vertex organoid model: A tool for the mechanical analysis of cell behavior on a spherical organoid shell.

Laussu J, Michel D, Magne L, Segonds S, Marguet S, Hamel D PLoS Comput Biol. 2025; 21(1):e1012681.

PMID: 39792958 PMC: 11771887. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012681.


Exploring the Role of Genetic and Environmental Features in Colorectal Cancer Development: An Agent-Based Approach.

Ledda M, Pluchino A, Ragusa M Entropy (Basel). 2024; 26(11).

PMID: 39593869 PMC: 11593013. DOI: 10.3390/e26110923.


Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.

Knapp A, Cruz D, Mehrad B, Laubenbacher R bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39574674 PMC: 11580862. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.31.596692.


Modeling the roles of cohesotaxis, cell-intercalation, and tissue geometry in collective cell migration of Xenopus mesendoderm.

Comlekoglu T, Dzamba B, Pacheco G, Shook D, Sego T, Glazier J Biol Open. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39162010 PMC: 11360141. DOI: 10.1242/bio.060615.


References
1.
Caviness Jr V . Patterns of cell and fiber distribution in the neocortex of the reeler mutant mouse. J Comp Neurol. 1976; 170(4):435-47. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901700404. View

2.
Darribere T, Schwarzbauer J . Fibronectin matrix composition and organization can regulate cell migration during amphibian development. Mech Dev. 2000; 92(2):239-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00245-8. View

3.
Salazar-Ciudad I, Garcia-Fernandez J, Sole R . Gene networks capable of pattern formation: from induction to reaction-diffusion. J Theor Biol. 2000; 205(4):587-603. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2092. View

4.
de Rouvroit C, Goffinet A . Neuronal migration. Mech Dev. 2001; 105(1-2):47-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4773(01)00396-3. View

5.
Rice D, Curran T . Role of the reelin signaling pathway in central nervous system development. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001; 24:1005-39. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1005. View