Central Macular Thickness in Diabetic Patients: A Sex-based Analysis

Overview

Journal Optom Vis Sci

Date 2019 Mar 26

PMID 30907864

Citations 5

Authors

Edmund Arthur

Stuart B Young

Ann E Elsner

Karthikeyan Baskaran

Joel A Papay

Matthew S Muller

Thomas J Gast

Bryan P Haggerty

Christopher A Clark

Victor E Malinovsky

Shane G Brahm

Taras V Litvin

Glen Y Ozawa

Jorge A Cuadros

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Significance: The pathological changes in clinically significant diabetic macular edema lead to greater retinal thickening in men than in women. Therefore, male sex should be considered a potential risk factor for identifying individuals with the most severe pathological changes. Understanding this excessive retinal thickening in men may help preserve vision.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the sex differences in retinal thickness in diabetic patients. We tested whether men with clinically significant macular edema had even greater central macular thickness than expected from sex differences without significant pathological changes. This study also aimed to determine which retinal layers contribute to abnormal retinal thickness.

Methods: From 2047 underserved adult diabetic patients from Alameda County, CA, 142 patients with clinically significant macular edema were identified by EyePACS-certified graders using color fundus images (Canon CR6-45NM). First, central macular thickness from spectral domain optical coherence tomography (iVue; Optovue Inc.) was compared in 21 men versus 21 women without clinically significant macular edema. Then, a planned comparison contrasted the greater values of central macular thickness in men versus women with clinically significant macular edema as compared with those without. Mean retinal thickness and variability of central macular layers were compared in men versus women.

Results: Men without clinically significant macular edema had a 12-μm greater central macular thickness than did women (245 ± 21.3 and 233 ± 13.4 μm, respectively; t40 = -2.18, P = .04). Men with clinically significant macular edema had a 67-μm greater central macular thickness than did women (383 ± 48.7 and 316 ± 60.4 μm, P < .001); that is, men had 55 μm or more than five times more (t20 = 2.35, P = .02). In men, the outer-nuclear-layer thickness was more variable, F10,10 = 9.34.

Conclusions: Underserved diabetic men had thicker retinas than did women, exacerbated by clinically significant macular edema.

Citing Articles

Gender and ethnic diversity in randomised clinical trials in age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema.

Ibrahim F, Sivaprasad S, Cheung C Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39979609 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03595-7.

Photoreceptor layer elevation due to subretinal fluid: Impact on visual acuity measurements and simulation from biometrics.

Parimi V, Elsner A, Papay J, Clark C, Miura M, Gast T Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024; 45(2):480-493.

PMID: 39723623 PMC: 11823303. DOI: 10.1111/opo.13422.

Clinically significant macular edema in an underserved population: Association with demographic factors and hemoglobin A1c.

Parimi V, Elsner A, Gast T, Chen Z, Baskaran K, Alhamami M Optom Vis Sci. 2024; 101(1):25-36.

PMID: 38350055 PMC: 11841732. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002096.

Retinal and Choroidal Changes in Men Compared with Women with Alzheimer's Disease: A Case-Control Study.

Mirzania D, Thompson A, Robbins C, Soundararajan S, Lee J, Agrawal R Ophthalmol Sci. 2022; 2(1):100098.

PMID: 36246183 PMC: 9559893. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100098.

OCTA reveals remodeling of the peripheral capillary free zones in normal aging.

Arthur E, Alber J, Thompson L, Sinoff S, Snyder P Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):15593.

PMID: 34341456 PMC: 8329222. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95230-0.

References

. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs--an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98(5 Suppl):786-806. View

Alhamami M, Elsner A, Malinovsky V, Clark C, Haggerty B, Ozawa G . Comparison of Cysts in Red and Green Images for Diabetic Macular Edema. Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 94(2):137-149. PMC: 5266646. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001010. View

Browning D, Glassman A, Aiello L, Beck R, Brown D, Fong D . Relationship between optical coherence tomography-measured central retinal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2006; 114(3):525-36. PMC: 2585542. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.052. View

Litvin T, Ozawa G, Bresnick G, Cuadros J, Muller M, Elsner A . Utility of hard exudates for the screening of macular edema. Optom Vis Sci. 2014; 91(4):370-5. PMC: 3969389. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000205. View

Chalam K, Bressler S, Edwards A, Berger B, Bressler N, Glassman A . Retinal thickness in people with diabetes and minimal or no diabetic retinopathy: Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(13):8154-61. PMC: 3522439. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-10290. View

Antonetti D, Klein R, Gardner T . Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(13):1227-39. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1005073. View

Chui T, Song H, Clark C, Papay J, Burns S, Elsner A . Cone photoreceptor packing density and the outer nuclear layer thickness in healthy subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(7):3545-53. PMC: 3406883. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8694. View

Yau J, Rogers S, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux E, Kowalski J, Bek T . Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35(3):556-64. PMC: 3322721. DOI: 10.2337/dc11-1909. View

Elsner A, Petrig B, Papay J, Kollbaum E, Clark C, Muller M . Fixation stability and scotoma mapping for patients with low vision. Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90(2):164-73. PMC: 3560296. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31827cda72. View

10.

Harrison W, Bearse Jr M, Schneck M, Wolff B, Jewell N, Barez S . Prediction, by retinal location, of the onset of diabetic edema in patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(9):6825-31. PMC: 3176012. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7533. View

11.

Shen Y, Liu K, Xu X . Correlation Between Visual Function and Photoreceptor Integrity in Diabetic Macular Edema: Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Curr Eye Res. 2015; 41(3):391-9. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1019003. View

12.

Ozawa G, Bearse Jr M, Adams A . Male-female differences in diabetic retinopathy?. Curr Eye Res. 2014; 40(2):234-46. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2014.958500. View

13.

Cuadros J, Bresnick G . EyePACS: an adaptable telemedicine system for diabetic retinopathy screening. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010; 3(3):509-16. PMC: 2769884. DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300315. View

14.

Browning D, McOwen M, Bowen Jr R, OMarah T . Comparison of the clinical diagnosis of diabetic macular edema with diagnosis by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111(4):712-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.028. View

15.

Wilkinson C, Ferris 3rd F, Klein R, Lee P, Agardh C, Davis M . Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110(9):1677-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00475-5. View

16.

Ozawa G, Bearse Jr M, Bronson-Castain K, Harrison W, Schneck M, Barez S . Neurodegenerative differences in the retinas of male and female patients with type 2 diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(6):3040-6. PMC: 3378087. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8226. View

17.

Arend O, Remky A, Elsner A, Bertram B, Reim M, Wolf S . Quantification of cystoid changes in diabetic maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995; 36(3):608-13. View

18.

Jonsson K, Frydkjaer-Olsen U, Grauslund J . Vascular Changes and Neurodegeneration in the Early Stages of Diabetic Retinopathy: Which Comes First?. Ophthalmic Res. 2016; 56(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1159/000444498. View

19.

Otani T, Yamaguchi Y, Kishi S . Correlation between visual acuity and foveal microstructural changes in diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2009; 30(5):774-80. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c2e0d6. View

20.

Raman R, Gupta A, Krishna S, Kulothungan V, Sharma T . Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic microvascular complications in newly diagnosed type II diabetes mellitus. Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular Genetic Study (SN-DREAMS, report 27). J Diabetes Complications. 2012; 26(2):123-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.02.001. View