» Articles » PMID: 30903337

Multi-detector CT Imaging: Impact of Virtual Tube Current Reduction and Sparse Sampling on Detection of Vertebral Fractures

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Mar 24
PMID 30903337
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on image quality and vertebral fracture diagnostics in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).

Materials And Methods: In routine MDCT scans of 35 patients (80.0% females, 70.6 ± 14.2 years, 65.7% showing vertebral fractures), reduced radiation doses were retrospectively simulated by virtually lowering tube currents and applying sparse sampling, considering 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original tube current and projections, respectively. Two readers evaluated items of image quality and presence of vertebral fractures. Readout between the evaluations in the original images and those with virtually lowered tube currents or sparse sampling were compared.

Results: A significant difference was revealed between the evaluations of image quality between MDCT with virtually lowered tube current and sparse-sampled MDCT (p < 0.001). Sparse-sampled data with only 25% of original projections still showed good to very good overall image quality and contrast of vertebrae as well as minimal artifacts. There were no missed fractures in sparse-sampled MDCT with 50% reduction of projections, and clinically acceptable determination of fracture age was possible in MDCT with 75% reduction of projections, in contrast to MDCT with 50% or 75% virtual tube current reduction, respectively.

Conclusion: Sparse-sampled MDCT provides adequate image quality and diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fracture detection with 50% of original projections in contrast to corresponding MDCT with lowered tube current. Thus, sparse sampling is a promising technique for dose reductions in MDCT that could be introduced in future generations of scanners.

Key Points: • MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 50% still showed high diagnostic accuracy without any missed vertebral fractures. • Clinically acceptable determination of vertebral fracture age was possible in MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 75%. • With sparse sampling, higher reductions in radiation exposure can be achieved without compromised image or diagnostic quality in routine MDCT of the spine as compared to MDCT with reduced tube currents.

Citing Articles

Multi-stream and multi-scale fusion rib fracture segmentation network based on UXNet.

Liu Y, Zhang L, Jiang Z Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025; 15(1):230-248.

PMID: 39839035 PMC: 11744184. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1356.


Tube current reduction and iterative image reconstruction for computed tomography myelography.

Paprottka K, Schultz V, Kupfer K, Beer M, Zimmer C, Kirschke J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27751.

PMID: 39533093 PMC: 11557565. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79374-3.


Exploring the Low-Dose Limit for Focal Hepatic Lesion Detection with a Deep Learning-Based CT Reconstruction Algorithm: A Simulation Study on Patient Images.

You Y, Zhong S, Zhang G, Wen Y, Guo D, Li W J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; 37(5):2089-2098.

PMID: 38502435 PMC: 11522246. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01080-3.


Impact of radiation dose reduction and iterative image reconstruction on CT-guided spine biopsies.

Paprottka K, Kupfer K, Schultz V, Beer M, Zimmer C, Baum T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):5054.

PMID: 36977710 PMC: 10050004. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32102-9.


Computed Tomography of the Spine : Systematic Review on Acquisition and Reconstruction Techniques to Reduce Radiation Dose.

Dieckmeyer M, Sollmann N, Kupfer K, Loffler M, Paprottka K, Kirschke J Clin Neuroradiol. 2022; 33(2):271-291.

PMID: 36416936 PMC: 10220150. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-022-01227-1.


References
1.
van der Klift M, de Laet C, McCloskey E, Hofman A, Pols H . The incidence of vertebral fractures in men and women: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17(6):1051-6. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.6.1051. View

2.
Mei K, Kopp F, Bippus R, Kohler T, Schwaiger B, Gersing A . Is multidetector CT-based bone mineral density and quantitative bone microstructure assessment at the spine still feasible using ultra-low tube current and sparse sampling?. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(12):5261-5271. PMC: 5674130. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4904-y. View

3.
Mookiah M, Subburaj K, Mei K, Kopp F, Kaesmacher J, Jungmann P . Multidetector Computed Tomography Imaging: Effect of Sparse Sampling and Iterative Reconstruction on Trabecular Bone Microstructure. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018; 42(3):441-447. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000710. View

4.
Abbas S, Lee T, Shin S, Lee R, Cho S . Effects of sparse sampling schemes on image quality in low-dose CT. Med Phys. 2013; 40(11):111915. DOI: 10.1118/1.4825096. View

5.
Zabic S, Wang Q, Morton T, Brown K . A low dose simulation tool for CT systems with energy integrating detectors. Med Phys. 2013; 40(3):031102. DOI: 10.1118/1.4789628. View