» Articles » PMID: 30892182

A Comparative Analysis of Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use in Long-term Care Facilities in Ireland, 2013 and 2016

Overview
Journal Euro Surveill
Date 2019 Mar 21
PMID 30892182
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BackgroundLong-term care facilities (LTCFs) are important locations of antimicrobial consumption. Of particular concern is inappropriate prescribing of prophylactic antimicrobials. AimWe aimed to explore factors related to antimicrobial prophylaxis in LTCFs in Ireland. MethodsThe point prevalence surveys of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Long-Term Care Facilities (HALT) were performed in Ireland in May 2013 and 2016. Data were collected on facility (type and stewardship initiatives) and resident characteristics (age, sex, antimicrobial and indication) for those meeting the surveillance definition for a HAI and/or prescribed an antimicrobial. ResultsIn 2013, 9,318 residents (in 190 LTCFs) and in 2016, 10,044 residents (in 224 LTCFs) were included. Of the 10% of residents prescribed antimicrobials, 40% were on prophylaxis, most of which was to prevent urinary tract infection. The main prophylactic agents were: nitrofurantoin (39%) and trimethoprim (41%) for urinary tract (UT); macrolides (47%) for respiratory tract and macrolides and tetracycline (56%) for skin or wounds. More than 50% of the prophylaxis was prescribed in intellectual disability facilities and around 40% in nursing homes. Prophylaxis was recorded more often for females, residents living in LTCFs for more than 1 year and residents with a urinary catheter. No difference in prophylactic prescribing was observed when comparing LTCFs participating and not participating in both years. ConclusionsForty per cent of antimicrobial prescriptions in Irish LTCFs were prophylactic. This practice is not consistent with national antimicrobial prescribing guidelines. Addressing inappropriate prophylaxis prescribing in Irish LTCFs should be a key objective of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

Citing Articles

Antimicrobial Agent Use for Urinary Tract Infection in Long-Term Care Facilities in Spain: Results from a Retrospective Analytical Cohort Analysis.

Matovelle P, Olivan-Blazquez B, Magallon-Botaya R, Garcia-Sangenis A, Monfa R, Morros R Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38391537 PMC: 10885965. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13020152.


Guidelines on Implementing Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Korea.

Yoon Y, Kwon K, Jeong S, Moon C, Kim B, Kiem S Infect Chemother. 2021; 53(3):617-659.

PMID: 34623784 PMC: 8511380. DOI: 10.3947/ic.2021.0098.


Temporal and regional trends of antibiotic use in long-term aged care facilities across 39 countries, 1985-2019: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Raban M, Gates P, Gasparini C, Westbrook J PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0256501.

PMID: 34424939 PMC: 8382177. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256501.

References
1.
Dancer S . The problem with cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001; 48(4):463-78. DOI: 10.1093/jac/48.4.463. View

2.
Wolf Jr J, Bennett C, Dmochowski R, Hollenbeck B, Pearle M, Schaeffer A . Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008; 179(4):1379-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.068. View

3.
Cetti R, Venn S, Woodhouse C . The risks of long-term nitrofurantoin prophylaxis in patients with recurrent urinary tract infection: a recent medico-legal case. BJU Int. 2008; 103(5):567-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08008.x. View

4.
McGeer A, Campbell B, Emori T, Hierholzer W, JACKSON M, Nicolle L . Definitions of infection for surveillance in long-term care facilities. Am J Infect Control. 1991; 19(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/0196-6553(91)90154-5. View

5.
Vellinga A, Cormican M, Hanahoe B, Murphy A . Predictive value of antimicrobial susceptibility from previous urinary tract infection in the treatment of re-infection. Br J Gen Pract. 2010; 60(576):511-3. PMC: 2894379. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X514765. View