» Articles » PMID: 30880007

Cancer Mutational Burden is Shaped by G4 DNA, Replication Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Overview
Date 2019 Mar 19
PMID 30880007
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A hallmark of cancer is genomic instability, which can enable cancer cells to evade therapeutic strategies. Here we employed a computational approach to uncover mechanisms underlying cancer mutational burden by focusing upon relationships between 1) translocation breakpoints and the thousands of G4 DNA-forming sequences within retrotransposons impacting transcription and exemplifying probable non-B DNA structures and 2) transcriptome profiling and cancer mutations. We determined the location and number of G4 DNA-forming sequences in the Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 38 and found a total of 358,605 covering ∼13.4 million bases. By analyzing >97,000 unique translocation breakpoints from the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer (COSMIC), we found that breakpoints are overrepresented at G4 DNA-forming sequences within hominid-specific SVA retrotransposons, and generally occur in tumors with mutations in tumor suppressor genes, such as TP53. Furthermore, correlation analyses between mRNA levels and exome mutational loads from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) encompassing >450,000 gene-mutation regressions revealed strong positive and negative associations, which depended upon tissue of origin. The strongest positive correlations originated from genes not listed as cancer genes in COSMIC; yet, these show strong predictive power for survival in most tumor types by Kaplan-Meier estimation. Thus, correlation analyses of DNA structure and gene expression with mutation loads complement and extend more traditional approaches to elucidate processes shaping genomic instability in cancer. The combined results point to G4 DNA, activation of cell cycle/DNA repair pathways, and mitochondrial dysfunction as three major factors driving the accumulation of somatic mutations in cancer cells.

Citing Articles

ZSeeker: An optimized algorithm for Z-DNA detection in genomic sequences.

Wang G, Mouratidis I, Provatas K, Chantzi N, Patsakis M, Georgakopoulos-Soares I bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990320 PMC: 11844381. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.07.637205.


A goldilocks computational protocol for inhibitor discovery targeting DNA damage responses including replication-repair functions.

Moiani D, Tainer J Front Mol Biosci. 2024; 11:1442267.

PMID: 39669672 PMC: 11635304. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1442267.


Non-B DNA-informed mutation burden as a marker of treatment response and outcome in cancer.

Xu Q, Kowalski J Br J Cancer. 2024; 131(11):1825-1832.

PMID: 39427051 PMC: 11589871. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02873-7.


Centromeric transposable elements and epigenetic status drive karyotypic variation in the eastern hoolock gibbon.

Hartley G, Okhovat M, Hoyt S, Fuller E, Pauloski N, Alexandre N bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39257810 PMC: 11384015. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.29.610280.


G-Quadruplex Forming DNA Sequence Context Is Enriched around Points of Somatic Mutations in a Subset of Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Zhuk A, Stepchenkova E, Zotova I, Belopolskaya O, Pavlov Y, Kostroma I Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(10).

PMID: 38791307 PMC: 11121618. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25105269.


References
1.
Gorlach A, Dimova E, Petry A, Martinez-Ruiz A, Hernansanz-Agustin P, Rolo A . Reactive oxygen species, nutrition, hypoxia and diseases: Problems solved?. Redox Biol. 2015; 6:372-385. PMC: 4565025. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.016. View

2.
Kejnovsky E, Tokan V, Lexa M . Transposable elements and G-quadruplexes. Chromosome Res. 2015; 23(3):615-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-015-9491-7. View

3.
Miyamoto Y, Kitamura N, Nakamura Y, Futamura M, Miyamoto T, Yoshida M . Possible existence of lysosome-like organella within mitochondria and its role in mitochondrial quality control. PLoS One. 2011; 6(1):e16054. PMC: 3022026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016054. View

4.
Grobner S, Worst B, Weischenfeldt J, Buchhalter I, Kleinheinz K, Rudneva V . The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers. Nature. 2018; 555(7696):321-327. DOI: 10.1038/nature25480. View

5.
Vogt J, Bengesser K, Claes K, Wimmer K, Mautner V, van Minkelen R . SVA retrotransposon insertion-associated deletion represents a novel mutational mechanism underlying large genomic copy number changes with non-recurrent breakpoints. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(6):R80. PMC: 4229983. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r80. View