» Articles » PMID: 30859489

ERCP-related Perforation: an Analysis of Operative Outcomes in a Large Series over 12 years

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Mar 13
PMID 30859489
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Perforation is a rare but serious adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of morbidity and mortality after surgical management of ERCP-related perforation (EP).

Methods: The records of patients with EP requiring surgical intervention at a tertiary referral center in a 12-year period (2004-2016) were retrospectively analyzed for demography, indications for ERCP, risk factors, timing and type of surgical repair, post-operative course, hospital stay, and outcome. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify the parameters predicting survival.

Results: Of 25,300 ERCPs, 380 (1.5%) had EP. Non-operative management was successful in 330 (86.8%) patients. 50 (13.2%) patients were operated for EP. Out of 50, the perforation was detected during ERCP (intra-procedure) in 32 patients (64%). In 30 patients (60%), the surgery was performed within 24 h of ERCP. Twenty patients underwent delayed surgery (after 24 h of ERCP) following the failure of initial non-operative management. The delayed surgery after an unsuccessful medical treatment had a detrimental effect on morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. Post-operative duodenal leak was the only independent predictor of 90-day mortality (p = 0.02, OR = 9.1, 95% CI 1.52-54.64). Addition of T-tube duodenostomy (TTD) to the primary repair for either type I or type II perforations increased post-operative duodenal leak (type I, p = 0.048 and type II; p = 0.001) and mortality (type I, p = 0.009 and type II, p = 0.045).

Conclusion: Although EP is a rare event, it has a serious impact on morbidity and mortality. Delaying of surgery following failed non-operative management worsens the prognosis. Addition of TTD to the repair is not helpful in these patients.

Citing Articles

Stapfer I and II duodenal perforations after endoscopic procedures: how surgical delay impacts outcomes.

Chenevas-Paule Q, Palen A, Giovannini M, Ewald J, Ratone J, Caillol F Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(11):6614-6624.

PMID: 39285044 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11232-9.


Diagnosis and management of type II endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: a multicenter retrospective study.

Shi D, Guo S, Bao Y, Wang Q, Pan W BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):241.

PMID: 39080542 PMC: 11290207. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03335-3.


Evaluation of ERCP-related perforation: a single-center retrospective study.

Zhou F, Zhan X, Hu D, Wu N, Hong J, Li G Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2024; 12:goae044.

PMID: 38766494 PMC: 11099543. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goae044.


Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related early perforations: A study of effects of procedure duration, complexity, and endoscopist experience.

Aloysius M, Goyal H, Nikumbh T, Shah N, Hammoud G, Mutha P World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023; 15(11):641-648.

PMID: 38073762 PMC: 10698332. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i11.641.


Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications: risk stratification, prevention, and management.

Wu C, Lim S, Khor C Clin Endosc. 2023; 56(4):433-445.

PMID: 37460103 PMC: 10393565. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.013.


References
1.
Snyder 3rd W, Weigelt J, WATKINS W, Bietz D . The surgical management of duodenal trauma. Precepts based on a review of 247 cases. Arch Surg. 1980; 115(4):422-9. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380040050009. View

2.
Carrillo E, Richardson J, Miller F . Evolution in the management of duodenal injuries. J Trauma. 1996; 40(6):1037-45; discussion 1045-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199606000-00035. View

3.
Machado N . Management of duodenal perforation post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP. 2012; 13(1):18-25. View

4.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View

5.
Dubecz A, Ottmann J, Schweigert M, Stadlhuber R, Feith M, Wiessner V . Management of ERCP-related small bowel perforations: the pivotal role of physical investigation. Can J Surg. 2012; 55(2):99-104. PMC: 3310764. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.027110. View