» Articles » PMID: 23299135

Management of Duodeno-pancreato-biliary Perforations After ERCP: Outcomes from an Italian Tertiary Referral Center

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Jan 10
PMID 23299135
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The management of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) perforation is often unknown by many physicians, and there is a paucity of literature regarding the best surgical management approach.

Patients And Methods: A retrospective review of ERCP-related perforations to the duodeno-pancreato-biliary tract observed at the Digestive Surgery Department of the Catholic University of Rome was conducted to identify their optimal management and clinical outcome.

Results: From January 1999 to December 2011, 30 perforations after ERCP were observed. Seven patients underwent ERCP at another institution, and 23 patients underwent an endoscopic procedure at our hospital. Diagnosis of perforation was both clinical and instrumental. Fifteen patients (50 %) were successfully treated conservatively. Fifteen patients (50 %) underwent surgery after a mean time of 8.1 days (range 1-26 days) from ERCP: ten received a retroperitoneal laparostomy approach, three of them both an anterior and posterior laparostomy approach, and two an anterior laparostomy approach. Duodenal leak closure was observed after a mean (± standard deviation, SD) of 12.6 (± 4.6) and 24.6 (± 7.9) days after conservative and surgical treatment, respectively (p < 0.001). The overall and postoperative mortality rates were 13.3 % (4 of 30 patients) and 26.6 % (4 of 15 patients), respectively.

Conclusions: Post-ERCP perforation is burdened by a high risk of mortality. Early clinical and radiographic features have to be used to determine which type of surgical or conservative treatment is indicated. Half of patients can be treated conservatively, but in case of sepsis or unstable general conditions, early surgical procedure is indicated as the only possible chance of recovery.

Citing Articles

Management of ERCP-Related Perforations: A Single-Center Experience.

Plecic N, Malenkovic A, Begovic A, Pavlovic A, Bulajic M, Bulajic M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797084 PMC: 11720675. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010001.


Stapfer I and II duodenal perforations after endoscopic procedures: how surgical delay impacts outcomes.

Chenevas-Paule Q, Palen A, Giovannini M, Ewald J, Ratone J, Caillol F Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(11):6614-6624.

PMID: 39285044 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11232-9.


Diagnosis and management of type II endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: a multicenter retrospective study.

Shi D, Guo S, Bao Y, Wang Q, Pan W BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):241.

PMID: 39080542 PMC: 11290207. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03335-3.


Comparative study between biliary covered self-expandable metal stent and conventional endoscopic bile drainage treatment in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related Stapfer type II retroperitoneal perforations.

Heo J, Jung M, Lee J, Lee D, Cho C, Cha J PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0300029.

PMID: 38470865 PMC: 10931455. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300029.


Clinical analysis of 45 cases of perforation were identified during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure.

Miao Y, Li Y, Cheng B, Zhan Y, Zeng S, Zhou X Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:1039954.

PMID: 36507518 PMC: 9729696. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1039954.


References
1.
Leese T, Neoptolemos J, Carr-Locke D . Successes, failures, early complications and their management following endoscopic sphincterotomy: results in 394 consecutive patients from a single centre. Br J Surg. 1985; 72(3):215-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800720325. View

2.
Scarlett P, Falk G . The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994; 64(12):843-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04561.x. View

3.
Trap R, Adamsen S, Hart-Hansen O, Henriksen M . Severe and fatal complications after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective series of claims to insurance covering public hospitals. Endoscopy. 1999; 31(2):125-30. DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-13659. View

4.
Cotton P, Lehman G, Vennes J, GEENEN J, Russell R, Meyers W . Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37(3):383-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2. View

5.
Freeman M, Nelson D, Sherman S, Haber G, Herman M, Dorsher P . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(13):909-18. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199609263351301. View