» Articles » PMID: 30854461

Reliability of Radiomic Features Across Multiple Abdominal CT Image Acquisition Settings: A Pilot Study Using ACR CT Phantom

Overview
Journal Tomography
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Mar 12
PMID 30854461
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We studied the reliability of radiomic features on abdominal computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with multiple CT image acquisition settings using the ACR (American College of Radiology) CT Phantom. Twenty-four sets of CT images of the ACR CT phantom were attained from a GE Discovery 750HD scanner using 24 different image acquisition settings, combinations of 4 tube currents (25, 50, 100, 200 Effective mAs), 3 slice thicknesses (1.25, 2.5, 5 mm), and 2 convolution kernels (STANDARD and SOFT). Polyethylene (-95 HU) and acrylic (120 HU) of the phantom model were selected for calculating real feature value; a noise-free, computer-generated phantom image series that reproduced the 2 objects and the background was used for calculating reference feature value. Feature reliability was defined as the degree of predicting reference feature value from real feature value. Radiomic features gray-level co-occurrence matrix ()y were investigated. The value of ≥ 0.85 was considered to be of high reliability. The reliability of and were high across all image acquisition settings. At 200 Effective mAs, all features except showed high reliability, whereas at 25 Effective mAs, most features (except and ) showed low reliability. From high to low, reliability was ranked in the following order: , , and . CT image acquisition settings affected the reliability of radiomic features. High reliable features were attained from images reconstructed at high tube current and thick slice thickness.

Citing Articles

Annotated test-retest dataset of lung cancer CT scan images reconstructed at multiple imaging parameters.

Zhao B, Dercle L, Yang H, Riely G, Kris M, Schwartz L Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1259.

PMID: 39567508 PMC: 11579286. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-04085-3.


Adjusting for the effect of IV contrast on automated CT body composition measures during the portal venous phase.

Moeller A, Garrett J, Summers R, Pickhardt P Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(7):2543-2551.

PMID: 38744704 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04376-8.


Protocol selection formalism for minimizing detectable differences in morphological radiomics features of lung lesions in repeated CT acquisitions.

Zarei M, Abadi E, Vancoillie L, Samei E J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024; 11(2):025501.

PMID: 38680209 PMC: 11047768. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.025501.


Technical and clinical considerations of a physical liver phantom for CT radiomics analysis.

Varghese B, Cen S, Jensen K, Levy J, Andersen H, Schulz A J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(4):e14309.

PMID: 38386922 PMC: 11005983. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14309.


Comparing fully automated AI body composition measures derived from thin and thick slice CT image data.

Lee M, Liu D, Garrett J, Perez A, Zea R, Summers R Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 49(3):985-996.

PMID: 38158424 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04135-1.


References
1.
Aberle D, Adams A, Berg C, Black W, Clapp J, Fagerstrom R . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(5):395-409. PMC: 4356534. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. View

2.
Ganeshan B, Panayiotou E, Burnand K, Dizdarevic S, Miles K . Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival. Eur Radiol. 2011; 22(4):796-802. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2319-8. View

3.
Parmar C, Leijenaar R, Grossmann P, Velazquez E, Bussink J, Rietveld D . Radiomic feature clusters and prognostic signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:11044. PMC: 4937496. DOI: 10.1038/srep11044. View

4.
Gillies R, Kinahan P, Hricak H . Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2015; 278(2):563-77. PMC: 4734157. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. View

5.
Lu L, Ehmke R, Schwartz L, Zhao B . Assessing Agreement between Radiomic Features Computed for Multiple CT Imaging Settings. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12):e0166550. PMC: 5199063. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166550. View