» Articles » PMID: 30853785

Energy Harvesting and Sensing with Embedded Piezoelectric Ceramics in Knee Implants

Overview
Date 2019 Mar 12
PMID 30853785
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The knee replacement is one of the most common orthopedic surgical interventions in the United States; however, recent studies have shown up to 20% of patients are dissatisfied with the outcome. One of the key issues to improving these operations is a better understanding of the ligamentous balance during and after surgery. The goal of this work is to investigate the feasibility of embedding piezoelectric transducers in the polyethylene bearing of a total knee replacement to act as self-powered sensors to aid in the alignment and balance of the knee replacement by providing intra- and postoperative feedback to the surgeon. A model consisting of a polyethylene disc with a single embedded piezoelectric ceramic transducer is investigated as a basis for future work. A modeling framework is developed including a biomechanical model of the knee joint, a finite element model of the knee bearing with encapsulated transducer, and an electromechanical model of the piezoelectric transducer. Model predictions show that a peak voltage of 2.3 V with a load resistance of 1.01 Ω can be obtained from a single embedded piezoelectric stack, and an average power of 12 can be obtained from a knee bearing with four embedded piezoelectric transducers. Uniaxial compression testing is also performed on a fabricated sample for model validation. The results found in this work show promising potential of embedded piezoelectric transducers to be utilized for autonomous, self-powered in vivo knee implant force sensors.

Citing Articles

Recent Progress and Challenges of Implantable Biodegradable Biosensors.

Alam F, Ahmed M, Jalal A, Siddiquee I, Adury R, Hossain G Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(4).

PMID: 38675286 PMC: 11051912. DOI: 10.3390/mi15040475.


Hybrid triboelectric-piezoelectric nanogenerator for long-term load monitoring in total knee replacements.

Chahari M, Salman E, Stanacevic M, Willing R, Towfighian S Smart Mater Struct. 2024; 33(5):055034.

PMID: 38645721 PMC: 11025032. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/ad3bfd.


The application of impantable sensors in the musculoskeletal system: a review.

Wang J, Chu J, Song J, Li Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1270237.

PMID: 38328442 PMC: 10847584. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1270237.


Sensor Technology in Fracture Healing.

Jeyaraman M, Jayakumar T, Jeyaraman N, Nallakumarasamy A Indian J Orthop. 2023; 57(8):1196-1202.

PMID: 37525725 PMC: 10386990. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-023-00933-3.


Bioelectronic multifunctional bone implants: recent trends.

Santos M, Bernardo R Bioelectron Med. 2022; 8(1):15.

PMID: 36127721 PMC: 9490885. DOI: 10.1186/s42234-022-00097-9.


References
1.
Kurtz S, Muratoglu O, Evans M, Edidin A . Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(18):1659-88. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00053-8. View

2.
Krzypow D, Rimnac C . Cyclic steady state stress-strain behavior of UHMW polyethylene. Biomaterials. 2000; 21(20):2081-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00138-1. View

3.
Harrington I . A bioengineering analysis of force actions at the knee in normal and pathological gait. Biomed Eng. 1976; 11(5):167-72. View

4.
Kirking B, Krevolin J, Townsend C, Colwell Jr C, DLima D . A multiaxial force-sensing implantable tibial prosthesis. J Biomech. 2005; 39(9):1744-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.023. View

5.
DLima D, Patil S, Steklov N, Slamin J, Colwell Jr C . Tibial forces measured in vivo after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(2):255-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.011. View