» Articles » PMID: 30853355

Application of Urinary Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Oncology
Urology
Date 2019 Mar 12
PMID 30853355
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) screening using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has caused unnecessary biopsies and overdiagnosis owing to its low accuracy and reliability. Therefore, there is an increased interest in identifying better PCa biomarkers. Studies showed that trained dogs can discriminate patients with PCa from unaffected men by sniffing urine. We hypothesized that urinary volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may be the source of that odor and could be used to develop urinary VOC PCa diagnosis models.

Patients And Methods: Urine samples from 55 and 53 biopsy proven PCa-positive and -negative patients respectively were initially obtained for diagnostic model development. Urinary metabolites were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. A PCa diagnosis model was developed and validated using innovative statistical machine-learning techniques. A second set of samples (53 PCa-positive and 22 PCa-negative patients) were used to evaluate the previously developed PCa diagnosis model.

Results: The analysis resulted in 254 and 282 VOCs for their significant association (P < .05) with either PCa-positive or -negative samples respectively. Regularized logistic regression analysis and the Firth method were then applied to predict PCa prevalence, resulting in a final model that contains 11 VOCs. Under cross-validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the final model was 0.92 (sensitivity, 0.96; specificity, 0.80). Further evaluation of the developed model using a testing cohort yielded an AUC of 0.86. As a comparison, the PSA-based diagnosis model only rendered an AUC of 0.54.

Conclusion: The study describes the development of a urinary VOC-based model for PCa detection.

Citing Articles

Volatile organic compounds exposure associated with skin cancer among U. S. adults: results from NHANES 2011-2018.

Zhang Z, Liang X, Lin K, Deng Y, Liang Y Arch Dermatol Res. 2025; 317(1):401.

PMID: 39951040 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-025-03954-0.


Volatile Organic Metabolites as Potential Biomarkers for Genitourinary Cancers: Review of the Applications and Detection Methods.

Holbrook K, Lee W Metabolites. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39852380 PMC: 11767221. DOI: 10.3390/metabo15010037.


Exploring Components, Sensors, and Techniques for Cancer Detection via eNose Technology: A Systematic Review.

Ramirez W, Pillajo V, Ramirez E, Manzano I, Meza D Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39686404 PMC: 11645018. DOI: 10.3390/s24237868.


Potential urinary volatile organic compounds as screening markers in cancer - a review.

Goertzen A, Kidane B, Ahmed N, Aliani M Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1448760.

PMID: 39655069 PMC: 11626232. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1448760.


Urinary volatile organic compounds (VOCs) based prostate cancer diagnosis via high-dimensional classification.

Quaye G, Lee W, Noriega Landa E, Badmos S, Holbrook K, Su X J Appl Stat. 2024; 51(16):3468-3485.

PMID: 39628860 PMC: 11610231. DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2024.2346355.