» Articles » PMID: 30852638

Impacts of Sampling Design on Estimates of Microbial Community Diversity and Composition in Agricultural Soils

Overview
Journal Microb Ecol
Date 2019 Mar 11
PMID 30852638
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Soil microbiota play important and diverse roles in agricultural crop nutrition and productivity. Yet, despite increasing efforts to characterize soil bacterial and fungal assemblages, it is challenging to disentangle the influences of sampling design on assessments of communities. Here, we sought to determine whether composite samples-often analyzed as a low cost and effort alternative to replicated individual samples-provide representative summary estimates of microbial communities. At three Minnesota agricultural research sites planted with an oat cover crop, we conducted amplicon sequencing for soil bacterial and fungal communities (16S and ITS2) of replicated individual or homogenized composite soil samples. We compared soil microbiota from within and among plots and then among agricultural sites using both sampling strategies. Results indicated that single or multiple replicated individual samples, or a composite sample from each plot, were sufficient for distinguishing broad site-level macroecological differences among bacterial and fungal communities. Analysis of a single sample per plot captured only a small fraction of the distinct OTUs, diversity, and compositional variability detected in the analysis of multiple individual samples or a single composite sample. Likewise, composite samples captured only a fraction of the diversity represented by the six individual samples from which they were formed, and, on average, analysis of two or three individual samples offered greater compositional coverage (i.e., greater number of OTUs) than a single composite sample. We conclude that sampling design significantly impacts estimates of bacterial and fungal communities even in homogeneously managed agricultural soils, and our findings indicate that while either strategy may be sufficient for broad macroecological investigations, composites may be a poor substitute for replicated samples at finer spatial scales.

Citing Articles

Association between bacterial community and cadmium distribution across Colombian cacao crops.

Jaramillo-Mazo C, Bravo D, Guerra Sierra B, Alvarez J Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(7):e0336323.

PMID: 38814085 PMC: 11218527. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03363-23.


Soil Micro-eukaryotic Diversity Patterns Along Elevation Gradient Are Best Estimated by Increasing the Number of Elevation Steps Rather than Within Elevation Band Replication.

Huang S, Lentendu G, Fujinuma J, Shiono T, Kubota Y, Mitchell E Microb Ecol. 2023; 86(4):2606-2617.

PMID: 37458790 PMC: 10640418. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-023-02259-x.


Uncovering the biogeographic pattern of the widespread nematode-trapping fungi : watershed is the key.

Deng W, Zhang F, Li Y, Zhang X, Fornacca D, Yang X Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1152751.

PMID: 37152762 PMC: 10156993. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1152751.


Those Nematode-Trapping Fungi That are not Everywhere: Hints Towards Soil Microbial Biogeography.

Deng W, Zhang F, Fornacca D, Yang X, Xiao W J Microbiol. 2023; 61(5):511-523.

PMID: 37022590 DOI: 10.1007/s12275-023-00043-7.


Effects of operational taxonomic unit inference methods on soil microeukaryote community analysis using long-read metabarcoding.

Eshghi Sahraei S, Furneaux B, Kluting K, Zakieh M, Rydin H, Hytteborn H Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(3):e8676.

PMID: 35342585 PMC: 8928899. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8676.


References
1.
Buckley D, Schmidt T . Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in soils from agro-ecosystems. Environ Microbiol. 2003; 5(6):441-52. DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00404.x. View

2.
Franklin R, Mills A . Multi-scale variation in spatial heterogeneity for microbial community structure in an eastern Virginia agricultural field. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003; 44(3):335-46. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00074-6. View

3.
Fierer N, Jackson R . The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(3):626-31. PMC: 1334650. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507535103. View

4.
Martiny J, Bohannan B, Brown J, Colwell R, Fuhrman J, Green J . Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006; 4(2):102-12. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1341. View

5.
Kang S, Mills A . The effect of sample size in studies of soil microbial community structure. J Microbiol Methods. 2006; 66(2):242-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.11.013. View