» Articles » PMID: 30830592

Islamic Perspectives on CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Human Germline Gene Editing: A Preliminary Discussion

Overview
Journal Sci Eng Ethics
Date 2019 Mar 5
PMID 30830592
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The recent development of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has rekindled the ethical debate concerning human germline modification that has begun decades ago. This inexpensive technology shows tremendous promise in disease prevention strategies, while raising complex ethical concerns about safety and efficacy of the technology, human dignity, tampering with God's creation, and human genetic enhancement. Germline gene editing may result in heritable changes in the human genome, therefore the question of whether it should be allowed requires deep and careful discussion from various perspectives. This paper explores Islamic perspectives on the concerns raised and highlights the ethical principles in Islam that should be taken into consideration when assessing the permissibility of CRISPR/ Cas9-mediated human germline gene editing. As argued in this paper, human germline gene editing would be considered lawful for medical purpose under certain conditions. It should not be applied on humans until the safety and efficacy issues are resolved. Robust ethical guidelines and strict regulations are necessary to preserve human dignity and to prevent premature and misuse of the technology. Maqasid al-shariah's principles of preservation of human life, lineage, and dignity and 'preventing harm takes precedence over securing benefit' are among the guiding principles in assessing the permissibility of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated human germline editing from an Islamic perspective. Further discussions are important to address the controversies as well as to explore the related ethical principles.

Citing Articles

Ethical Perspectives of Therapeutic Human Genome Editing From Multiple and Diverse Viewpoints: A Scoping Review.

Joseph A, Karas M, Ramadan Y, Joubran E, Jacobs R Cureus. 2022; 14(11):e31927.

PMID: 36582559 PMC: 9793437. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31927.


Playing God? Religious Perspectives on Manipulating the Genome.

Kalidasan V, Das K J Relig Health. 2022; 61(4):3192-3218.

PMID: 35025007 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-022-01497-6.


CRISPR-Cas9 and He Jiankui's Case: an Islamic Bioethics Review using and .

Alsomali N, Hussein G Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021; 13(2):149-165.

PMID: 34394752 PMC: 8298734. DOI: 10.1007/s41649-021-00167-1.


Genetic counseling in the context of Bangladesh: current scenario, challenges, and a framework for genetic service implementation.

Hosen M, Anwar S, Mourosi J, Chakraborty S, Miah M, Vanakker O Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021; 16(1):168.

PMID: 33836792 PMC: 8034097. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01804-6.

References
1.
Ishii T . Germline genome-editing research and its socioethical implications. Trends Mol Med. 2015; 21(8):473-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.05.006. View

2.
Tang L, Zeng Y, Du H, Gong M, Peng J, Zhang B . CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human zygotes using Cas9 protein. Mol Genet Genomics. 2017; 292(3):525-533. DOI: 10.1007/s00438-017-1299-z. View

3.
Isa N, Baharuddin A, Man S, Chang L . Bioethics in the Malay-Muslim Community in Malaysia: A Study on the Formulation of Fatwa on Genetically Modified Food by the National Fatwa Council. Dev World Bioeth. 2014; 15(3):143-51. DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12057. View

4.
Heidari R, Shaw D, Elger B . CRISPR and the Rebirth of Synthetic Biology. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016; 23(2):351-363. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9768-z. View

5.
Gross M . Bacterial scissors to edit human embryos?. Curr Biol. 2015; 25(11):R439-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.027. View