» Articles » PMID: 27278445

Proceedings of the International Summit on Human Gene Editing: a Global Discussion-Washington, D.C., December 1-3, 2015

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Jun 10
PMID 27278445
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The US Academies of Sciences and Medicine, the Royal Society, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences convened a summit of experts in biology, medicine, law, ethics, sociology, and journalism, in December 2015 to review the state of the art in gene editing technology and discuss the medical and social ramifications of the technologies. The summit concluded with the following consensus recommendations: (1) intensive basic and preclinical research in animal and human models should proceed with appropriate legal and ethical oversight; (2) clinical applications in somatic cells must be rigorously evaluated within existing and evolving regulatory frameworks for gene therapy; (3) it would be irresponsible to proceed with any clinical use of germline editing until relevant safety and efficacy issues have been resolved and there is broad societal consensus about such a use; and (4) the international community should strive to establish generally acceptable uses of human germline editing.

Citing Articles

Comparison of public discussions of gene editing on social media between the United States and China.

Ji J, Robbins M, Featherstone J, Calabrese C, Barnett G PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0267406.

PMID: 35500011 PMC: 9060334. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267406.


Novel Therapies for Prevention and Early Treatment of Cardiomyopathies.

Repetti G, Toepfer C, Seidman J, Seidman C Circ Res. 2019; 124(11):1536-1550.

PMID: 31120825 PMC: 7092753. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.313569.


Gene Therapy Leaves a Vicious Cycle.

Goswami R, Subramanian G, Silayeva L, Newkirk I, Doctor D, Chawla K Front Oncol. 2019; 9:297.

PMID: 31069169 PMC: 6491712. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00297.


Islamic Perspectives on CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Human Germline Gene Editing: A Preliminary Discussion.

Isa N, Zulkifli N, Man S Sci Eng Ethics. 2019; 26(1):309-323.

PMID: 30830592 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00098-z.


The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.

van Dijke I, Bosch L, Bredenoord A, Cornel M, Repping S, Hendriks S Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(9):1777-1796.

PMID: 30085071 PMC: 6454467. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey257.