» Articles » PMID: 30813545

Gynecological Cancers Translational, Research Implementation, and Harmonization: Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Consensus and Still Open Questions

Abstract

In the era of personalized medicine, the introduction of translational studies in clinical trials has substantially increased their costs, but provides the possibility of improving the productivity of trials with a better selection of recruited patients. With the overall goal of creating a roadmap to improve translational design for future gynecological cancer trials and of defining translational goals, a main discussion was held during a brainstorming day of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Translational Research Committee and overall conclusions are here reported. A particular emphasis was dedicated to the new frontier of the immunoprofiling of gynecological cancers. The discussion pointed out that to maximize patients' benefit, translational studies should be integral to clinical trial design with standardization and optimization of procedures including a harmonization program of Standard Operating Procedures. Pathology-reviewed sample collection should be mandatory and ensured by dedicated funding. Biomarker validation and development should be made public and transparent to ensure rapid progresses with positive outcomes for patients. Guidelines/templates for patients' informed consent are needed. Importantly for the public, recognized goals are to increase the involvement of advocates and to improve the reporting of translational data in a forum accessible to patients.

Citing Articles

Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review.

Rivera-Izquierdo M, Maes-Carballo M, Jimenez-Moleon J, Martinez-Ruiz V, Blaakaer J, Olmedo-Requena R Health Expect. 2023; 26(3):1019-1038.

PMID: 37016907 PMC: 10154819. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13753.


Organoids of the female reproductive tract.

Chumduri C, Turco M J Mol Med (Berl). 2021; 99(4):531-553.

PMID: 33580825 PMC: 8026429. DOI: 10.1007/s00109-020-02028-0.


Ovarian Cancer Translational Activity of the Multicenter Italian Trial in Ovarian Cancer (MITO) Group: Lessons Learned in 10 Years of Experience.

Califano D, Russo D, Scognamiglio G, Losito N, Spina A, Bello A Cells. 2020; 9(4).

PMID: 32272732 PMC: 7226822. DOI: 10.3390/cells9040903.

References
1.
Lesko L, Atkinson Jr A . Use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug development and regulatory decision making: criteria, validation, strategies. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001; 41:347-66. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.347. View

2.
Deniger D, Pasetto A, Robbins P, Gartner J, Prickett T, Paria B . T-cell Responses to "Hotspot" Mutations and Unique Neoantigens Expressed by Human Ovarian Cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24(22):5562-5573. PMC: 6239943. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0573. View

3.
Parkinson C, Gale D, Piskorz A, Biggs H, Hodgkin C, Addley H . Exploratory Analysis of TP53 Mutations in Circulating Tumour DNA as Biomarkers of Treatment Response for Patients with Relapsed High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study. PLoS Med. 2016; 13(12):e1002198. PMC: 5172526. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002198. View

4.
Mirza M, Monk B, Herrstedt J, Oza A, Mahner S, Redondo A . Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(22):2154-2164. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611310. View

5.
Hwang W, Adams S, Tahirovic E, Hagemann I, Coukos G . Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating T cells in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 124(2):192-8. PMC: 3298445. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.039. View