Challenges of Implementing a Standardized Process for Discharge Summaries (5 Years Experience)

Overview

Journal Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med

Date 2019 Feb 27

PMID 30805513

Authors

Eyad AlMidani

Ahmad Qudair

Emad Khadawardi

Turki Alshareef

Sami Shoura

Rania AlObari

Sami Alhajjar

Saleh Almofada

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Discharge summaries are essential documents to provide a long-lasting record of a patient's visit to a hospital. It provides an effective method of communication between various hospital services and primary care providers.We conducted a study recently in KFSH&RC recommending that every admitted patient to the Pediatric Department must have a discharge summary initiated as soon as possible within the first five days of hospitalization and to be updated periodically until its completion on the patient's discharge day. Results of this study showed that most of the patients received their discharge summaries within the time limit as recommended by the JCIA standard.

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to present our department's experience in regard to the difficulties, challenges, and outcomes of the adopted work flow for discharge summaries over a period of five years.

Methods: The residents have been instructed to initiate the discharge summaries as soon as possible within the first five days of hospitalization for every patient admitted under the Department of Pediatrics regardless of the expected discharge date. Afterward, it will be the responsibility of the attending junior and senior residents to update the summaries on regular basis as long as the patient under their care. They should transfer the updated summary to the coming resident that will take over the medical care until the discharge day when the most recent update will be forwarded to the attending consultant for final review and signature.

Results: Between 2011 and 2016, a significant drop in the number of delinquent records was noted. From 1131 delinquent records at the end of the fourth quarter of 2011, the number has fallen to 15 in the fourth quarter of 2016. Furthermore, compliance to JCIA documentation standards showed sustained improvement since the initiation of the project. The department used to score around 50% in the discharge documentation compliance rate which has improved to be maintained around 80%s in average.

Conclusions: Every new project concerning the quality of patient care provided in any institution is expected to face multiple challenges and difficulties. Proper identifications of the challenges, standardize approach for solutions, sustainability of quality monitoring for an improvement projects can maintain the success for any new project.

References

van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin P, Laupacis A . Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17(3):186-92. PMC: 1495026. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10741.x. View

Forster A, Murff H, Peterson J, Gandhi T, Bates D . The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138(3):161-7. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00007. View

Forster A, Clark H, Menard A, Dupuis N, Chernish R, Chandok N . Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. CMAJ. 2004; 170(3):345-9. PMC: 331384. View

Coleman E, Berenson R . Lost in transition: challenges and opportunities for improving the quality of transitional care. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(7):533-6. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00009. View

Roy C, Poon E, Karson A, Ladak-Merchant Z, Johnson R, Maviglia S . Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143(2):121-8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-2-200507190-00011. View

Kripalani S, Lefevre F, Phillips C, Williams M, Basaviah P, Baker D . Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007; 297(8):831-41. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.8.831. View

Lane N, Bragg M . From emergency department to general practitioner: evaluating emergency department communication and service to general practitioners. Emerg Med Australas. 2007; 19(4):346-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00983.x. View

Kripalani S, Jackson A, Schnipper J, Coleman E . Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2007; 2(5):314-23. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.228. View

Balaban R, Weissman J, Samuel P, Woolhandler S . Redefining and redesigning hospital discharge to enhance patient care: a randomized controlled study. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(8):1228-33. PMC: 2517968. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0618-9. View

10.

Coit M, Katz J, McMahon G . The effect of workload reduction on the quality of residents' discharge summaries. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 26(1):28-32. PMC: 3024111. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1465-z. View

11.

Kind A, Thorpe C, Sattin J, Walz S, Smith M . Provider characteristics, clinical-work processes and their relationship to discharge summary quality for sub-acute care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 27(1):78-84. PMC: 3250552. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1860-0. View

12.

Li J, Yong T, Hakendorf P, Ben-Tovim D, Thompson C . Timeliness in discharge summary dissemination is associated with patients' clinical outcomes. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 19(1):76-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01772.x. View

13.

Wass A, Illingworth R . What information do general practitioners want about accident and emergency patients?. J Accid Emerg Med. 1996; 13(6):406-8. PMC: 1342810. DOI: 10.1136/emj.13.6.406. View