» Articles » PMID: 12558354

The Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Affecting Patients After Discharge from the Hospital

Overview
Journal Ann Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2003 Feb 1
PMID 12558354
Citations 552
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Studies of hospitalized patients identify safety as a significant problem, but few data are available regarding injuries occurring after discharge. Patients may be vulnerable during this transition period.

Objective: To describe the incidence, severity, preventability, and "ameliorability" of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital and to develop strategies for improving patient safety during this interval.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: A tertiary care academic hospital.

Patients: 400 consecutive patients discharged home from the general medical service.

Measurements: The three main outcomes were adverse events, defined as injuries occurring as a result of medical management; preventable adverse events, defined as adverse events judged to have been caused by an error; and ameliorable adverse events, defined as adverse events whose severity could have been decreased. Posthospital course was determined by performing a medical record review and a structured telephone interview approximately 3 weeks after each patient's discharge. Outcomes were determined by independent physician reviews.

Results: Seventy-six patients had adverse events after discharge (19% [95% CI, 15% to 23%]). Of these, 23 had preventable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]) and 24 had ameliorable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]). Three percent of injuries were serious laboratory abnormalities, 65% were symptoms, 30% were symptoms associated with a nonpermanent disability, and 3% were permanent disabilities. Adverse drug events were the most common type of adverse event (66% [CI, 55% to 76%]), followed by procedure-related injuries (17% [CI, 8% to 26%]). Of the 25 adverse events resulting in at least a nonpermanent disability, 12 were preventable (48% [CI, 28% to 68%]) and 6 were ameliorable (24% [CI, 7% to 41%]).

Conclusion: Adverse events occurred frequently in the peridischarge period, and many could potentially have been prevented or ameliorated with simple strategies.

Citing Articles

Understanding hospital activity and outcomes for people with multimorbidity using electronic health records.

Georgiev K, McPeake J, Shenkin S, Fleuriot J, Lone N, Guthrie B Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8522.

PMID: 40074787 PMC: 11903850. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92940-7.


Interventions to Support Transitions in Care Among Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.

Rezaei N, Kersen J, Thomas A, Kurbatfinski S, Lorenzetti D, Sauro K Cancer Med. 2025; 14(5):e70660.

PMID: 40018786 PMC: 11868792. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70660.


Survey of medication history of patients with stroke after discharge from an acute hospital ward: a case series study.

Fukuda Y, Ito R, Kakihana M, Takahashi T, Kanemoto T, Sahara T J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2025; 11(1):10.

PMID: 39901218 PMC: 11789315. DOI: 10.1186/s40780-025-00415-8.


What's Going On With Me and How Can I Better Manage My Health? The Potential of GPT-4 to Transform Discharge Letters Into Patient-Centered Letters to Enhance Patient Safety: Prospective, Exploratory Study.

Eisinger F, Holderried F, Mahling M, Stegemann-Philipps C, Herrmann-Werner A, Nazarenus E J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e67143.

PMID: 39836954 PMC: 11795158. DOI: 10.2196/67143.


Effectiveness of Synchronous Postdischarge Contacts on Health Care Use and Patient Satisfaction : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Boggan J, Sankineni S, Dennis P, Chen D, Sledge T, Halpern D Ann Intern Med. 2025; 178(2):229-240.

PMID: 39805113 PMC: 11884509. DOI: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-01140.