6.
Lee C, Lee C, Kim Y, Hong Y, Yoo J
. Dynamic sagittal imbalance of the spine in degenerative flat back: significance of pelvic tilt in surgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(18):2029-35.
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00017.
View
7.
Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, Maruiwa H, Watanabe M, Nishizawa T
. Intraspinal cyst communicating with the intervertebral disc in the lumbar spine: discal cyst. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(19):2112-8.
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00014.
View
8.
Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A
. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(23):2521-32; discussion 2532-4.
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002.
View
9.
Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Kitagawa T, Tamai K, Saotome K
. Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and short-form 36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(14):1601-7.
View
10.
Guyer R, Ohnmeiss D
. Intervertebral disc prostheses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(15 Suppl):S15-23.
DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076843.59883.E1.
View
11.
Grotle M, Brox J, Vollestad N
. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(1):130-40.
View
12.
Kim D, Lee S, Lee H, Lee H, Chang S, Chung S
. Validation of the Korean version of the oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(5):E123-7.
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157172.00635.3a.
View
13.
Mannion A, Junge A, Fairbank J, Dvorak J, Grob D
. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Eur Spine J. 2005; 15(1):55-65.
PMC: 3454571.
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0815-0.
View
14.
Blumenthal S, McAfee P, Guyer R, Hochschuler S, Geisler F, Holt R
. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(14):1565-75.
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170587.32676.0e.
View
15.
Turner J, Ersek M, Herron L, Haselkorn J, Kent D, Ciol M
. Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA. 1992; 268(7):907-11.
View
16.
Kim K, Lee S, Lee Y, Bae S, Suk K
. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(12):1351-7.
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000218635.14571.55.
View
17.
Mousavi S, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A, Mobini B
. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(14):E454-9.
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.
View
18.
Martin B, Mirza S, Comstock B, Gray D, Kreuter W, Deyo R
. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(3):382-7.
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254104.55716.46.
View
19.
Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak J, Linovitz R, Danielson 3rd G, Haider T
. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(11):1155-62.
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377.
View
20.
Robertson P, Plank L
. Prospective cohort analysis of disability reduction with lumbar spinal fusion surgery in community practice. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008; 21(4):235-40.
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180ca712c.
View