» Articles » PMID: 18525482

Prospective Cohort Analysis of Disability Reduction with Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Community Practice

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Jun 6
PMID 18525482
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Prospective cohort study of lumbar spinal fusion.

Objective: To examine the functional changes subsequent to lumbar spinal fusion in a total procedure audit in a community spinal surgery practice.

Summary Of Background Data: Several randomized controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy of spinal fusion procedures across diagnoses, but demonstrating effectiveness in community practice has been more difficult. Hospital database studies demonstrate incidence, reoperation rates, and complications of spinal fusions, yet cannot demonstrate outcomes consistently. The challenge is to demonstrate functional benefits from spinal fusion in a community setting.

Methods: Over a 5-year period all patients in a community practice who underwent lumbar spinal fusion procedures with additional pedicle screw stabilization for degenerative, spondylolytic and spondylolisthetic conditions, were evaluated with application of the Modified Rowland 23 point Questionnaire of Disability preoperatively, and at 1-year postoperative assessment. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results: A median 10-point improvement in the Modified Roland Questionnaire score was achieved across 160 patients, and the improvement was highly statistically significant for the major diagnoses--degenerative spondylolisthesis, discogenic low back pain, and spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis. Greater reduction of disability was seen in primary procedures when compared with revision surgery, and in noncompensation patients when compared with compensation patients, although in neither case was the difference statistically significant.

Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that consistent functional improvements can be achieved across a total population of lumbar spinal fusions in a nonacademic setting. It also demonstrated that use of prospective cohort analysis techniques, with adequate follow up, and minimal increased costs to patients and practice, is a sustainable prospective audit technique.

Citing Articles

The SNAP Trial: 2-Year Results of a Double-Blind Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of a Silicon Nitride Versus a PEEK Cage in Patients After Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Kersten R, Oner F, Arts M, Mitroiu M, Roes K, De Gast A Global Spine J. 2021; 12(8):1687-1695.

PMID: 33406905 PMC: 9609539. DOI: 10.1177/2192568220985472.


Two-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus silicon nitride spinal fusion cages in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders.

McEntire B, Maslin G, Bal B J Spine Surg. 2020; 6(3):523-540.

PMID: 33102889 PMC: 7548827. DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-588.


Lumbar Spinal Fusion Affects Sitting Disability on the Floor.

Shim C, Lee S Int J Spine Surg. 2019; 13(1):95-101.

PMID: 30805292 PMC: 6383455. DOI: 10.14444/6013.


Risk factors for lumbar intervertebral disc height narrowing: a population-based longitudinal study in the elderly.

Akeda K, Yamada T, Inoue N, Nishimura A, Sudo A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16:344.

PMID: 26552449 PMC: 4640385. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0798-5.


The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol.

Kersten R, van Gaalen S, Arts M, Roes K, de Gast A, Corbin T BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15:57.

PMID: 24568365 PMC: 3937453. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-57.