» Articles » PMID: 30804326

Pubertal Maturation and Sex Effects on the Default-mode Network Connectivity Implicated in Mood Dysregulation

Abstract

This study examines the effects of puberty and sex on the intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) of brain networks, with a focus on the default-mode network (DMN). Consistently implicated in depressive disorders, the DMN's function may interact with puberty and sex in the development of these disorders, whose onsets peak in adolescence, and which show strong sex disproportionality (females > males). The main question concerns how the DMN evolves with puberty as a function of sex. These effects are expected to involve within- and between-network iFC, particularly, the salience and the central-executive networks, consistent with the Triple-Network Model. Resting-state scans of an adolescent community sample (n = 304, male/female: 157/147; mean/std age: 14.6/0.41 years), from the IMAGEN database, were analyzed using the AFNI software suite and a data reduction strategy for the effects of puberty and sex. Three midline regions (medial prefrontal, pregenual anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate), within the DMN and consistently implicated in mood disorders, were selected as seeds. Within- and between-network clusters of the DMN iFC changed with pubertal maturation differently in boys and girls (puberty-X-sex). Specifically, pubertal maturation predicted weaker iFC in girls and stronger iFC in boys. Finally, iFC was stronger in boys than girls independently of puberty. Brain-behavior associations indicated that lower connectivity of the anterior cingulate seed predicted higher internalizing symptoms at 2-year follow-up. In conclusion, weaker iFC of the anterior DMN may signal disconnections among circuits supporting mood regulation, conferring risk for internalizing disorders.

Citing Articles

Dev-Atlas: A reference atlas of functional brain networks for typically developing adolescents.

Doucet G, Goldsmith C, Myers K, Rice D, Ende G, Pavelka D Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025; 72:101523.

PMID: 39938145 PMC: 11870229. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101523.


Neural Correlates of Irritability and Potential Moderating Effects of Inhibitory Control.

DeSerisy M, Cohen J, Yang H, Ramphal B, Greenwood P, Mehta K Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025; 5(2):100420.

PMID: 39867565 PMC: 11758128. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100420.


Puberty interacts with sleep and brain network organization to predict mental health.

Mitchell M, Nugiel T Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1379945.

PMID: 39398321 PMC: 11466844. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1379945.


Striatal correlates of Bayesian beliefs in self-efficacy in adolescents and their relation to mood and autonomy: a pilot study.

Romaniuk L, MacSweeney N, Atkinson K, Chan S, Barbu M, Lawrie S Cereb Cortex Commun. 2023; 4(4):tgad020.

PMID: 38089939 PMC: 10712445. DOI: 10.1093/texcom/tgad020.


Engineering Virtuous health habits using Emotion and Neurocognition: Flexibility for Lifestyle Optimization and Weight management (EVEN FLOW).

Smith P, Whitson H, Merwin R, OHayer C, Strauman T Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1256430.

PMID: 38076541 PMC: 10702760. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1256430.


References
1.
Goddings A, Burnett Heyes S, Bird G, Viner R, Blakemore S . The relationship between puberty and social emotion processing. Dev Sci. 2012; 15(6):801-11. PMC: 3795450. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01174.x. View

2.
Luciana M . Commentary on the Special Issue on the Adolescent Brain: Incentive-based striving and the adolescent brain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 70:339-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.018. View

3.
Casey B, Duhoux S, Malter Cohen M . Adolescence: what do transmission, transition, and translation have to do with it?. Neuron. 2010; 67(5):749-60. PMC: 3014527. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.033. View

4.
Broyd S, Demanuele C, Debener S, Helps S, James C, Sonuga-Barke E . Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008; 33(3):279-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.002. View

5.
McClelland J, Rogers T . The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4(4):310-22. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1076. View