» Articles » PMID: 30804324

Comparison of Visceral Fat Measurement by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry to Computed Tomography in HIV and Non-HIV

Overview
Journal Nutr Diabetes
Date 2019 Feb 27
PMID 30804324
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/objectives: Individuals with HIV are susceptible to visceral fat accumulation, which confers an increased risk of cardiometabolic disease. Advanced software to ascertain visceral fat content from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has not been validated among this population. We sought to compare DXA with computed tomography (CT) in the measurement of visceral fat cross-sectional area (VAT) in HIV and non-HIV using Bland-Altman analyses.

Subjects/methods: Data were combined from five previously conducted studies of individuals with HIV (n = 313) and controls without HIV (n = 144) in which paired DXA and CT scans were available. In cross-sectional analyses, DXA-VAT was compared with CT-VAT among participants with and without HIV. In longitudinal analyses, changes in VAT over time were compared between DXA and CT among participants with and without HIV receiving no intervention over 12 months and among individuals with HIV receiving tesamorelin-a medication known to reduce VAT-over 6 months.

Results: In HIV, DXA underestimated VAT compared with CT among individuals with increased visceral adiposity. The measurement bias was -9 ± 47 cm overall, but became progressively larger with greater VAT (P < 0.0001), e.g., -61 ± 58 cm among those with VAT ≥ 200 cm. Sex-stratified analyses revealed that the relationship between VAT and measurement bias was especially pronounced in men (P < 0.0001). Longitudinally, DXA underestimated changes in VAT, particularly among those at the extremes of VAT gain or loss (P < 0.0001). In contrast to the cross-sectional findings, the tendency for DXA to underestimate longitudinal changes in VAT was evident in both men and women. Analogous findings were seen among controls in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

Conclusions: DXA underestimated VAT relative to CT in men with and without HIV, who had increased visceral adiposity. DXA also underestimated changes in VAT over time in men and women, irrespective of HIV status. DXA-VAT should be used with caution among both HIV and non-HIV-infected populations.

Citing Articles

Gender-specific accuracy of lipid accumulation product index for the screening of metabolic syndrome in general adults: a meta-analysis and comparative analysis with other adiposity indicators.

Witarto B, Witarto A, Visuddho V, Kencono Wungu C, Maimunah U, Rejeki P Lipids Health Dis. 2024; 23(1):198.

PMID: 38926783 PMC: 11201307. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02190-1.


Forecasting and validating fat mass ratio models through anthropometric measurements and health-related factors among people with HIV: a cross-sectional investigation.

Santos A, da Silva L, Navarro A, Cordeiro J, Marchiori G, Abdalla P Ann Transl Med. 2024; 12(3):44.

PMID: 38911564 PMC: 11193570. DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-1946.


Efficacy and safety of tesamorelin in people with HIV on integrase inhibitors.

Russo S, Ockene M, Arpante A, Johnson J, Lee H, Toribio M AIDS. 2024; 38(12):1758-1764.

PMID: 38905488 PMC: 11365754. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003965.


Weight Gain and Antiretroviral Therapy.

Bailin S, Koethe J Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2024; 38(3):499-515.

PMID: 38871568 PMC: 11305935. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2024.04.005.


Visceral Adiposity Index as a Measure of Cardiovascular Disease in Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Thomas T, Dunderdale C, Lu M, Walpert A, Shen G, Young M Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023; 10(8):ofad398.

PMID: 37559752 PMC: 10407462. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad398.


References
1.
Wajchenberg B . Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2001; 21(6):697-738. DOI: 10.1210/edrv.21.6.0415. View

2.
Hadigan C, Meigs J, Wilson P, DAgostino R, Davis B, Basgoz N . Prediction of coronary heart disease risk in HIV-infected patients with fat redistribution. Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 36(7):909-16. DOI: 10.1086/368185. View

3.
Hayashi T, Boyko E, Leonetti D, McNeely M, Newell-Morris L, Kahn S . Visceral adiposity and the prevalence of hypertension in Japanese Americans. Circulation. 2003; 108(14):1718-23. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087597.59169.8D. View

4.
Glickman S, Marn C, Supiano M, Dengel D . Validity and reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of abdominal adiposity. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004; 97(2):509-14. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01234.2003. View

5.
Fox C, Massaro J, Hoffmann U, Pou K, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu C . Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2007; 116(1):39-48. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675355. View