» Articles » PMID: 30800479

"Our Lab is the Community": Defining Essential Supporting Infrastructure in Engagement Research

Overview
Date 2019 Feb 26
PMID 30800479
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Effective patient engagement is central to patient-centered outcomes research. A well-designed infrastructure supports and facilitates patient engagement, enabling study development and implementation. We sought to understand infrastructure needs from recipients of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) pilot grant awards.

Methods: We surveyed recipients of PCORI pilot project awards on self-perceived strengths in engagement infrastructure through PCORI's Ways of Engaging-Engagement Activity Tool survey, and interviewed leaders of 8 projects who volunteered as exemplars. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey findings. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts.

Results: Of the 50 surveyed pilots, 22 answered the engagement infrastructure questions (44% response rate). Survey and interview findings emphasized the importance of committed institutional leadership, ongoing relationships with stakeholder organizations, and infrastructure funding through Clinical and Translational Science Awards, PCORI, and institutional discretionary funds.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of and how to improve upon existing institutional infrastructure.

Citing Articles

Educational Needs and Preferences for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in the Cystic Fibrosis Community: Mixed Methods Study.

Godfrey E, Kazmerski T, Brown G, Thayer E, Mentch L, Pam M JMIR Form Res. 2021; 5(3):e24302.

PMID: 33661127 PMC: 7974760. DOI: 10.2196/24302.


Essential elements to "design for dissemination" within a research network-a modified Delphi study of the Community-Academic Aging Research Network (CAARN).

Pinzon M, Myers S, Renken J, Eggert E, Chewning B, Mahoney J Implement Sci Commun. 2021; 2(1):18.

PMID: 33579395 PMC: 7881665. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00122-z.


Reducing tobacco use among women of childbearing age: Contributions of tobacco regulatory science and tobacco control.

Kurti A Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019; 28(5):501-516.

PMID: 31855002 PMC: 8168442. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000342.


Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Trial Comparing Team-Based to Clinician-Focused Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care.

Totten A, Fagnan L, Dorr D, Michaels L, Izumi S, Combe A J Palliat Med. 2019; 22(S1):82-89.

PMID: 31486729 PMC: 7366267. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0117.

References
1.
Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E, Becker A . Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004; 14(2):182-97. DOI: 10.1080/13576280110051055. View

2.
Horowitz C, Robinson M, Seifer S . Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared?. Circulation. 2009; 119(19):2633-42. PMC: 2796448. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729863. View

3.
Tendulkar S, Chu J, Opp J, Geller A, DiGirolamo A, Gandelman E . A funding initiative for community-based participatory research: lessons from the Harvard Catalyst Seed Grants. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011; 5(1):35-44. PMC: 3726716. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0005. View

4.
Deverka P, Lavallee D, Desai P, Esmail L, Ramsey S, Veenstra D . Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. J Comp Eff Res. 2012; 1(2):181-194. PMC: 3371639. DOI: 10.2217/cer.12.7. View

5.
Holzer J, Kass N . Community engagement strategies in the original and renewal applications for CTSA grant funding. Clin Transl Sci. 2014; 7(1):38-43. PMC: 5414461. DOI: 10.1111/cts.12125. View