» Articles » PMID: 24528898

Community Engagement Strategies in the Original and Renewal Applications for CTSA Grant Funding

Overview
Journal Clin Transl Sci
Date 2014 Feb 18
PMID 24528898
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program has highlighted community engagement in research by requiring institutions to develop bidirectional relationships with communities to obtain funding. Little is known about how institutions have operationalized that requirement. This study aimed to describe the strategies proposed by the first institutions to receive CTSA funding and to undergo the CTSA renewal process.

Methods: The authors conducted a qualitative document analysis of the community engagement section of 12 original and 10 renewal grant applications of the 12 institutions awarded CTSA funding in 2006 and renewed in 2010.

Results: Institutions employed - and research engagement strategies. Capacity-building strategies included education, pilot grants, connecting potential partners, and community research centers. Research engagement strategies ranged from those that allowed for very little input from communities, such as announcements, to those that allowed for a high amount of input from communities, such as community-researcher teams.

Conclusion: CTSA funding has supported capacity-building for institutions and communities to partner. Engagement strategies employed by the institutions are largely known from prior community-engaged research. Based on the grants from these institutions, the CTSA funding has largely enabled institutions to develop capacity to engage.

Citing Articles

The intersection of community engagement and team science research: A scoping review.

Hohl S, Blakeney E, Carter-Edwards L, Ramirez M, Wright S, Zierler B J Clin Transl Sci. 2025; 8(1):e208.

PMID: 39790471 PMC: 11713437. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.644.


The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.

Cunningham-Erves J, Mayo-Gamble T, Campbell L, Barlow B, Barajas C, Jones J Health Expect. 2024; 27(4):e14161.

PMID: 39087753 PMC: 11292665. DOI: 10.1111/hex.14161.


The community voices program to facilitate community-academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program's usefulness.

Ramirez M, Wool J, Bishop S, Hara-Hubbard K, Jang S, Leong J J Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 7(1):e237.

PMID: 38028353 PMC: 10663767. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.657.


Learning the language of science: A pilot study exploring citizen scientists' identity and communication with researchers.

Damiani R, Krieger J, Treise D, Walsh-Childers K, Fisher C, Bloodworth S J Clin Transl Sci. 2022; 5(1):e208.

PMID: 35047219 PMC: 8727718. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.847.


"It has to be designed in a way that really challenges people's assumptions": preparing scholars to build equitable community research partnerships.

Yan C, Haque S, Chassler D, Lobb R, Battaglia T, Sprague Martinez L J Clin Transl Sci. 2021; 5(1):e182.

PMID: 34849257 PMC: 8596064. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.858.


References
1.
Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, Garlehner G, Lohr K, Griffith D . Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004; (99):1-8. PMC: 4780908. View

2.
Zerhouni E . Translational and clinical science--time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(15):1621-3. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb053723. View

3.
Wallerstein N, Duran B . Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100 Suppl 1:S40-6. PMC: 2837458. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036. View

4.
Tindana P, Singh J, Tracy C, Upshur R, Daar A, Singer P . Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(9):e273. PMC: 1989740. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273. View

5.
Sung N, Crowley Jr W, Genel M, Salber P, Sandy L, Sherwood L . Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003; 289(10):1278-87. DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1278. View