» Articles » PMID: 30796489

Functional Double-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts with Preserved Insertions is an Effective Treatment for Tibiofemoral Instability

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2019 Feb 24
PMID 30796489
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to introduce a modified anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using functional double bundles (F-DBACLR), which achieved sequential tensioning at all flexion angles postoperatively, and compare its clinical outcomes with the anatomical single-bundle technique (A-SBACLR).

Methods: A total of 156 patients with an ACL injury underwent ACLR (A-SB group, n = 78; F-DB group, n = 78). All operations were performed by anatomically identifying the ACL footprints and fixing the graft at a pre-determined degree of knee flexion. Two observers blinded to the patient identities examined the patients preoperatively and during follow-up (median 28.2 months; range 26-31 months). Multiple subjective and objective clinical evaluation tests and assessment of clinical outcomes concerning the translational and rotational stability of the knee including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity Scale, KT-1000 laxity measurements, Lachman test and pivot-shift test were performed preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results: Preoperatively, no differences were found between the two groups. During the 2-year observation period, patients in the F-DB group revealed better clinical outcomes in terms of the Tegner Activity Scale Score, IKDC, KOOS and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. Similar results were shown in regard to the translational stability in both groups, while the F-DB group had more rotational stability at 2 years of follow-up.

Conclusions: The clinical outcomes indicated that F-DBACLR is clinically practicable and advantageous in the treatment of the ACL-deficient knee.

Level Of Evidence: II.

Citing Articles

Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Knee Stability Outcomes.

Elsenosy A, Elnewishy A, Rezk K, Delewar R, Teama H, Abdelfatah A Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75352.

PMID: 39759597 PMC: 11700015. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75352.


Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Alomari M, Ghaddaf A, Abdulhamid A, Alshehri M, Ashraf M, Alharbi H Indian J Orthop. 2022; 56(10):1669-1684.

PMID: 36187591 PMC: 9485407. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00718-0.


No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion": A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gupta R, Kapoor A, Soni A, Khatri S, Masih G, Raghav M Indian J Orthop. 2020; 54(5):665-671.

PMID: 32850031 PMC: 7429638. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00073-y.


No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:" A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gupta R, Kapoor A, Soni A, Khatri S, Masih G, Raghav M Indian J Orthop. 2019; 53(6):721-726.

PMID: 31673172 PMC: 6804384. DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_214_19.

References
1.
Muller B, Hofbauer M, Wongcharoenwatana J, Fu F . Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Int Orthop. 2012; 37(2):239-46. PMC: 3560906. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1683-6. View

2.
Sun R, Chen B, Wang F, Wang X, Chen J . Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and joint degeneration for double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 23(4):1171-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2934-4. View

3.
Woo S, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Yagi M, Papageorgiou C, Fu F . The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon . A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(6):907-14. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200206000-00003. View

4.
. SUMMER COURSES IN APPLIED MECHANICS AT BROWN UNIVERSITY. Science. 1941; 93(2424):562. DOI: 10.1126/science.93.2424.562. View

5.
Mae T, Shino K, Nakata K, Toritsuka Y, Otsubo H, Fujie H . Optimization of graft fixation at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: effect of initial tension. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36(6):1087-93. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508314433. View