» Articles » PMID: 30785881

Using Machine Learning Models to Predict Oxygen Saturation Following Ventilator Support Adjustment in Critically Ill Children: A Single Center Pilot Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Feb 21
PMID 30785881
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In an intensive care units, experts in mechanical ventilation are not continuously at patient's bedside to adjust ventilation settings and to analyze the impact of these adjustments on gas exchange. The development of clinical decision support systems analyzing patients' data in real time offers an opportunity to fill this gap.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether a machine learning predictive model could be trained on a set of clinical data and used to predict transcutaneous hemoglobin oxygen saturation 5 min (5min SpO2) after a ventilator setting change.

Data Sources: Data of mechanically ventilated children admitted between May 2015 and April 2017 were included and extracted from a high-resolution research database. More than 776,727 data rows were obtained from 610 patients, discretized into 3 class labels (< 84%, 85% to 91% and c92% to 100%).

Performance Metrics Of Predictive Models: Due to data imbalance, four different data balancing processes were applied. Then, two machine learning models (artificial neural network and Bootstrap aggregation of complex decision trees) were trained and tested on these four different balanced datasets. The best model predicted SpO2 with area under the curves < 0.75.

Conclusion: This single center pilot study using machine learning predictive model resulted in an algorithm with poor accuracy. The comparison of machine learning models showed that bagged complex trees was a promising approach. However, there is a need to improve these models before incorporating them into a clinical decision support systems. One potentially solution for improving predictive model, would be to increase the amount of data available to limit over-fitting that is potentially one of the cause for poor classification performances for 2 of the three class labels.

Citing Articles

Predicting COPD Readmission: An Intelligent Clinical Decision Support System.

Lopez-Canay J, Casal-Guisande M, Pinheira A, Golpe R, Comesana-Campos A, Fernandez-Garcia A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941248 PMC: 11816376. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030318.


Predictive analytics in bronchopulmonary dysplasia: past, present, and future.

McOmber B, Moreira A, Kirkman K, Acosta S, Rusin C, Shivanna B Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1483940.

PMID: 39633818 PMC: 11615574. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1483940.


Evaluating AI Methods for Pulse Oximetry: Performance, Clinical Accuracy, and Comprehensive Bias Analysis.

Cabanas A, Saez N, Collao-Caiconte P, Martin-Escudero P, Pagan J, Jimenez-Herranz E Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39593722 PMC: 11591227. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11111061.


Innovative Predictive Approach towards a Personalized Oxygen Dosing System.

Pascual-Saldana H, Masip-Bruin X, Asensio A, Alonso A, Blanco I Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(3).

PMID: 38339481 PMC: 10857553. DOI: 10.3390/s24030764.


Severity of illness and organ dysfunction scoring systems in pediatric critical care: The impacts on clinician's practices and the future.

Recher M, Leteurtre S, Canon V, Baudelet J, Lockhart M, Hubert H Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:1054452.

PMID: 36483470 PMC: 9723400. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1054452.


References
1.
Rose L, Schultz M, Cardwell C, Jouvet P, McAuley D, Blackwood B . Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children: a cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2015; 19:48. PMC: 4344786. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0755-6. View

2.
Jouvet P, Eddington A, Payen V, Bordessoule A, Emeriaud G, Gasco R . A pilot prospective study on closed loop controlled ventilation and oxygenation in ventilated children during the weaning phase. Crit Care. 2012; 16(3):R85. PMC: 3580628. DOI: 10.1186/cc11343. View

3.
. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: consensus recommendations from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015; 16(5):428-39. PMC: 5253180. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000350. View

4.
Smallwood C, Walsh B, Arnold J, Gouldstone A . Equilibration Time Required for Respiratory System Compliance and Oxygenation Response Following Changes in Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Children. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46(5):e375-e379. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003001. View

5.
Pannu S, Dziadzko M, Gajic O . How Much Oxygen? Oxygen Titration Goals during Mechanical Ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193(1):4-5. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201509-1810ED. View