» Articles » PMID: 30777350

[Neuraxial Labor Analgesia: a Literature Review]

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2019 Feb 20
PMID 30777350
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of analgesia techniques for labor has become increasingly frequent, with neuraxial techniques being the most commonly used and most effective. Labor pain entails a number of physiological consequences that may be negative for the mother and fetus, and therefore must be treated. This literature review was performed through a search in the PubMed database, from July to November 2016, and included articles in English or Portuguese, published between 2011 and 2016 or anteriorly, if relevant to the topic. The techniques were divided into the following topics: induction (epidural, combined epidural-spinal, continuous spinal, and epidural with dural puncture) and maintenance of analgesia (continuous epidural infusion, patient-controlled epidural analgesia, and intermittent epidural bolus). Epidural analgesia does not alter the incidence of cesarean sections or fetal prognosis, and maternal request is a sufficient indication for its initiation. The combined technique has the advantage of a faster onset of analgesia; however, patients are subject to a higher incidence of pruritus resulting from the intrathecal administration of opioids. Patient-controlled analgesia seems to be an excellent technique, reducing the consumption of local anesthetics, the number of anesthesiologist interventions, and increasing maternal satisfaction.

Citing Articles

Technical aspects of neuraxial analgesia during labor and maternity care: an updated overview.

Coviello A, Iacovazzo C, Frigo M, Ianniello M, Cirillo D, Tierno G J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025; 5(1):6.

PMID: 39881415 PMC: 11780834. DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00224-3.


Analysis of clinical application effects of Esketamine combining Sufentanil in labor analgesia and their impacts on postpartum depression.

Jiang H, Quan S, Su Y, Li J, Zhang X Pak J Med Sci. 2024; 40(9):1914-1918.

PMID: 39416617 PMC: 11476173. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.9.8689.


Effects of different anesthesia methods on labor process and postpartum serum estrogen and progesterone levels in primiparas with painless labor.

Liu J, Shi C, Wang D, Cui X, Geng L, Cui J Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024; 79:100442.

PMID: 38996725 PMC: 11301188. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100442.


Analgesia in labour: a necessity or a privilege.

Qamar J, Mansoor M, Jabbar S, Khan M Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 309(6):2943-2944.

PMID: 38528265 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07485-3.


The Efficacy of Dural Puncture Epidural Performed by 27-gauge Whitacre Needle in Labour Epidural Analgesia: Randomized Single-Blinded Controlled Study.

Pazur I, Ozegic O, Lijovic L, Jaic K, Pesic M Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2023; 51(4):304-310.

PMID: 37587657 PMC: 10440478. DOI: 10.4274/TJAR.2023.221085.


References
1.
Wassen M, Hukkelhoven C, Scheepers H, Smits L, Nijhuis J, Roumen F . Epidural analgesia and operative delivery: a ten-year population-based cohort study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 183:125-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.023. View

2.
Halpern S, Carvalho B . Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(3):921-8. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181951a7f. View

3.
Volmanen P, Palomaki O, Ahonen J . Alternatives to neuraxial analgesia for labor. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011; 24(3):235-41. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328345ad18. View

4.
Vallejo M, Ramesh V, Phelps A, Sah N . Epidural labor analgesia: continuous infusion versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia with background infusion versus without a background infusion. J Pain. 2007; 8(12):970-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.07.002. View

5.
Hellams A, Sprague T, Saldanha C, Archambault M . Nitrous oxide for labor analgesia. JAAPA. 2017; 31(1):41-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000527700.00698.8c. View