The Best Encouraging Persons in Labor: A Content Analysis of Iranian Mothers' Experiences of Labor Support

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2017 Jul 7

PMID 28683112

Citations 26

Authors

Tahereh Fathi Najafi

Robab Latifnejad Roudsari

Hossein Ebrahimipour

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Aims: The process of giving birth is very stressing for the mother. Meanwhile, maternity ward staff's lack of awareness of mothers' fears make mothers feel lonely and helpless. This study aimed to explore women's perceptions of labor support during vaginal delivery.

Materials And Methods: This exploratory qualitative study used qualitative content analysis to explore Iranian mothers' experiences of labor support. Data were collected using observations and semi-structured interviews with 25 individuals. The participants were recruited through a purposive sampling method.

Results: Three categories, including "involvement of the spouse in the labor process", "asking for a companion during labor", and "mother's self-care to cope with labor pain", emerged during data analysis. These categories were merged to form the main theme of "trying to comply with the labor process".

Conclusion: Women believed that the presence of a companion, e.g. their husband, a family member, or a doula, during labor helped them better deal with the labor process, particularly when they felt lonely. Health care providers are expected to consider the needs of mothers and try to provide holistic support for mothers during labor pain.

Implications For Practice: It seems that some mothers adopted particular coping strategies without receiving any relevant training. It is noteworthy that although mothers may make every effort to minimize their pain, health professionals should also practice medical approaches to help them through the process of labor.

Citing Articles

Husbands' Perception of Environmental Characteristics During Participation in Physiologic Delivery.

Ghamgosar F, Yazdanfar S, Nikkhah E, Yari H, Honarbakhsh M J Family Reprod Health. 2024; 17(3):151-164.

PMID: 38716293 PMC: 11070737. DOI: 10.18502/jfrh.v17i3.13538.

Preferences for childbirth delivery and pain relief methods among pregnant women in Vietnam.

Nguyen T, Nguyen L, Thi Nguyen H, Dam V, Vu T, Latkin C Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1290232.

PMID: 38352144 PMC: 10861798. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1290232.

Comparison of maternal outcomes in caring by Doula, trained lay companion and routine midwifery care.

Shahbazi Sighaldeh S, Azadpour A, Vakilian K, Rahimi Foroushani A, Vasegh Rahimparvar S, Hantoushzadeh S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):765.

PMID: 37907873 PMC: 10619238. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05987-7.

'Do we need doulas…?' - Perspectives of maternity care managers on the role of doulas in Poland.

Wojcik-Brylska K, Pawlicka P, Tataj-Puzyna U, Szlendak B, Baranowska B Nurs Open. 2023; 10(11):7186-7200.

PMID: 37605550 PMC: 10563425. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1965.

Fear of childbirth and its determinants in pregnant women in the third trimester: a cross-sectional study.

Zhang T, Liu M, Min F, Wei W, Liu Y, Tong J BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):574.

PMID: 37553654 PMC: 10408108. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05070-7.

References

Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

Campero L, Garcia C, Diaz C, Ortiz O, Reynoso S, Langer A . "Alone, I wouldn't have known what to do": a qualitative study on social support during labor and delivery in Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 47(3):395-403. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00077-x. View

Klomp T, Mannien J, de Jonge A, Hutton E, Lagro-Janssen A . What do midwives need to know about approaches of women towards labour pain management? A qualitative interview study into expectations of management of labour pain for pregnant women receiving midwife-led care in the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2013; 30(4):432-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.013. View

Johansson M, Fenwick J, Premberg A . A meta-synthesis of fathers' experiences of their partner's labour and the birth of their baby. Midwifery. 2014; 31(1):9-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.05.005. View

Hofmeyr G, Nikodem V, Wolman W, Chalmers B, Kramer T . Companionship to modify the clinical birth environment: effects on progress and perceptions of labour, and breastfeeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991; 98(8):756-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13479.x. View

Hodnett E, Gates S, Hofmeyr G, Sakala C . Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 7:CD003766. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5. View

Bogossian F . Social support: proposing a conceptual model for application to midwifery practice. Women Birth. 2007; 20(4):169-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2007.08.003. View

Backstrom C, Hertfelt Wahn E . Support during labour: first-time fathers' descriptions of requested and received support during the birth of their child. Midwifery. 2009; 27(1):67-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.07.001. View

Story W, Burgard S, Lori J, Taleb F, Ali N, Hoque D . Husbands' involvement in delivery care utilization in rural Bangladesh: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012; 12:28. PMC: 3364886. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-28. View

10.

Hildingsson I, Cederlof L, Widen S . Fathers' birth experience in relation to midwifery care. Women Birth. 2011; 24(3):129-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2010.12.003. View

11.

Khresheh R . Support in the first stage of labour from a female relative: the first step in improving the quality of maternity services. Midwifery. 2009; 26(6):e21-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.11.003. View

12.

Diniz C, DOrsi E, Domingues R, Torres J, Dias M, Schneck C . Implementation of the presence of companions during hospital admission for childbirth: data from the Birth in Brazil national survey. Cad Saude Publica. 2014; 30 Suppl 1:S1-14. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00127013. View

13.

Melender H . What constitutes a good childbirth? A qualitative study of pregnant Finnish women. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006; 51(5):331-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.02.009. View

14.

Pascali-Bonaro D, Kroeger M . Continuous female companionship during childbirth: a crucial resource in times of stress or calm. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004; 49(4 Suppl 1):19-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.04.017. View

15.

McGrath S, Kennell J . A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth. 2008; 35(2):92-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00221.x. View

16.

Sapkota S, Kobayashi T, Takase M . Husbands' experiences of supporting their wives during childbirth in Nepal. Midwifery. 2010; 28(1):45-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.010. View

17.

Spiby H, Slade P, Escott D, Henderson B, Fraser R . Selected coping strategies in labor: an investigation of women's experiences. Birth. 2003; 30(3):189-94. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.00244.x. View

18.

Escott D, Spiby H, Slade P, Fraser R . The range of coping strategies women use to manage pain and anxiety prior to and during first experience of labour. Midwifery. 2004; 20(2):144-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2003.11.001. View

19.

Cohen S, Wills T . Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985; 98(2):310-57. View

20.

Carlsson I, Hallberg L, Odberg Pettersson K . Swedish women's experiences of seeking care and being admitted during the latent phase of labour: a grounded theory study. Midwifery. 2007; 25(2):172-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.02.003. View