» Articles » PMID: 30774947

Root Imaging Showing Comparisons in Root Distribution and Ontogeny in Novel Populations and Closely Related Perennial Ryegrass Varieties

Abstract

The incorporation of new sophisticated phenotyping technologies within a crop improvement program allows for a plant breeding strategy that can include selections for major root traits previously inaccessible due to the challenges in their phenotype assessment. High-throughput precision phenotyping technology is employed to evaluate root ontogeny and progressive changes to root architecture of both novel amphiploid and introgression lines of over four consecutive months of the growing season and these compared under the same time frame to that of closely related perennial ryegrass () varieties. Root imaging using conventional photography and assembled multiple merged images was used to compare frequencies in root number, their distribution within 0-20 and 20-40 cm depths within soil columns, and progressive changes over time. The hybrids had more extensive root systems in comparison with , and this was especially evident at depth. It was shown that the acquisition of extensive root systems in hybrids was not dependent on the presence of an entire genome. On the contrary, the most pronounced effect on root development within the four populations studied was observed in the introgression line Bx509, where a single small genome sequence from had been previously transferred onto its homoeologous site on the long arm of chromosome 3 of an otherwise complete genome. This demonstrates that a targeted introgression-breeding approach may be sufficient to confer a significant improvement in the root morphology in without a significant compromise to its genome integrity. The forage production of Bx509 was either higher (months 1-3) or equivalent to (month 4) that of its parent control demonstrating that the enhanced root development achieved by the introgression line was without compromise to its agronomic performance.

Citing Articles

The soil microbiome of Lolium perenne L. depends on host genotype, is modified by nitrogen level and varies across season.

Paina C, Fois M, Asp T, Jensen J, Hansen P, Rohde P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5767.

PMID: 38459164 PMC: 10923896. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56353-2.


Designing agricultural grasses to help mitigate proteolysis during ensiling to optimize protein feed provisions for livestock.

Muhandiram N, Humphreys M, Fychan R, Davies J, Sanderson R, Marley C Food Energy Secur. 2024; 12(4):e475.

PMID: 38439908 PMC: 10909542. DOI: 10.1002/fes3.475.


Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research.

Williamson H, Brettschneider J, Caccamo M, Davey R, Goble C, Kersey P F1000Res. 2023; 10:324.

PMID: 36873457 PMC: 9975417. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.52204.2.


Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery-derived soil compaction?.

Muhandiram N, Humphreys M, Fychan R, Davies J, Sanderson R, Marley C Food Energy Secur. 2020; 9(3):e227.

PMID: 32999718 PMC: 7507784. DOI: 10.1002/fes3.227.


A route to decreasing N pollution from livestock: Use of hybrids improves efficiency of N flows in rumen simulation fermenters.

Kamau S, Belanche A, Davies T, Stevens P, Humphreys M, Kingston-Smith A Food Energy Secur. 2020; 9(3):e209.

PMID: 32999716 PMC: 7507801. DOI: 10.1002/fes3.209.


References
1.
Rogers E, Monaenkova D, Mijar M, Nori A, Goldman D, Benfey P . X-Ray Computed Tomography Reveals the Response of Root System Architecture to Soil Texture. Plant Physiol. 2016; 171(3):2028-40. PMC: 4936573. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00397. View

2.
Fang S, Clark R, Zheng Y, Iyer-Pascuzzi A, Weitz J, Kochian L . Genotypic recognition and spatial responses by rice roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(7):2670-5. PMC: 3574932. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222821110. View

3.
Alm V, Busso C, Ergon A, Rudi H, Larsen A, Humphreys M . QTL analyses and comparative genetic mapping of frost tolerance, winter survival and drought tolerance in meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.). Theor Appl Genet. 2011; 123(3):369-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-011-1590-z. View

4.
Turner L, Cairns A, Armstead I, Thomas H, Humphreys M, Humphreys M . Does fructan have a functional role in physiological traits? Investigation by quantitative trait locus mapping. New Phytol. 2008; 179(3):765-775. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02495.x. View

5.
Kell D . Breeding crop plants with deep roots: their role in sustainable carbon, nutrient and water sequestration. Ann Bot. 2011; 108(3):407-18. PMC: 3158691. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr175. View